Panel filter Vs Induction kit ? ? ?.
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Panel filter Vs Induction kit ? ? ?.
As thread, I want to start adding some tweaks to the scoob ( already has PPP fitted ) and feel the air filter should be first,but which one ?.
Looking for ideas here with regards to best filter/induction kit out there for reasonable money and more importantly what the general census is, induction kit or panel filter ?.
Any advice appreciated .
Cheer's.
Mark.
Looking for ideas here with regards to best filter/induction kit out there for reasonable money and more importantly what the general census is, induction kit or panel filter ?.
Any advice appreciated .
Cheer's.
Mark.
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
imho i wouldnt use a induction kit as a tweek. subaru spent a lot of money developing the air box and filter method wghich to me is the best way to go. i changed the standard scoob air panel filter for a second hand K&N one off a guy on here (only £15-45 new) give it a clean and popped it on. car sounds and performs much more freely now, and the air box prevents the hot air from the rest of the car engine interfearing (as what would probably happen with a open induction kit)
hth
andy
hth
andy
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Andy,
Guessed as much with the induction kit but am open to further opinion on it, there must be some benefits to having one ?.
Just thinking back to my cossie days and an induction kit was a must have.
So anyone else out there ?.
By the way it's a 03 Impreza blobeye to which the kit will be fitted.
Cheer's.
Guessed as much with the induction kit but am open to further opinion on it, there must be some benefits to having one ?.
Just thinking back to my cossie days and an induction kit was a must have.
So anyone else out there ?.
By the way it's a 03 Impreza blobeye to which the kit will be fitted.
Cheer's.
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tony95
as per previous threads on this forum,only above about 350bhp does the use of an induction kit start to become necessary. even then a well routed cold air feed is a must.
im looking for a relaible 300bhp+ when a remap is done withoout many engine mods and a fellow off here told me to keep the standard air filter system and just upgrade the panel filter until serious bhp is required
andy
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
It's pissing about with induction kits which knackers the MAF and, said by some on here, to therefore mean an engine rebuild at a cost of £1000's!!!!
Do NOT **** about with it FFS
Pete
Do NOT **** about with it FFS
Pete
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tony95
as per previous threads on this forum,only above about 350bhp does the use of an induction kit start to become necessary. even then a well routed cold air feed is a must.
#12
Too much "bull" floating around concerning the limitations of the standard airbox. It may be concerned specific versions, but I know for a fact the standard airbox on a newage flows more than enough for well in excess of 420bhp.
I would only change to an induction kit, if a)I had reached the limit of the airbox and/or b)engine modifications required such a much - as already mentioned, say moving to a FMIC etc.
Regards,
Shaun.
I would only change to an induction kit, if a)I had reached the limit of the airbox and/or b)engine modifications required such a much - as already mentioned, say moving to a FMIC etc.
Regards,
Shaun.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bebind the wheel of my red rice rocket
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
shaun is spot on on - i'm running 350bhp using a standard sti panel filter. Thery guys i know who use cones etc seem to get problem after problem
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: west yorkshire
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have wing induction on mine as this is seperate from the engine with an apexi air filter so when sat in traffic there is no heat soak also had no problems with maf etc. but as stated above the standard box can be good for 350+ think its more down to personal taste.
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: google "SMACS" We're # 1!
Posts: 8,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also got 350bhp on a standard panel k&n filter from powerstation after remap and exhuast change. Supertouring has a induction kit, and tbh, I found it a bit grating, and not a little bit, dare I say, [cough]chav[/cough]
Nice to hear I can go upto 420bhp though before I need to get one!
Nice to hear I can go upto 420bhp though before I need to get one!
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Solihull
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My suggestion would be to spend the money on something else. If you have to do something, fit a new paper filter if the old one is contaminated. We tested a few panel filters and found aprroximately 0.0 bhp gain so we don't think you'll se any real improvement either
Mike
Mike
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Near a V-Power petrol station or A&B roads
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cold air feed here. Don't put induction kit on if it's going to be just in the engine bay. The Cold Air feed will set you up for the inevitable upgrade cycle of cold air feed, bigger intercooler (Top or FMIC), Remaps, Bigger turbo, better brakes, better handling, blah, blah, stop now while you can, give your wallet a chance ........
#18
Thats strange Mike, as we did back to back testing (and back again because we couldnt believe it made that much difference and then back again just to be sure), but between the standard filter and the high flow one we used it made 8bhp+ difference each time (without even touching on the positive gains everywhere else through the power and torque curve). As I said we tested this several times, same day, same rollers, same conditions. Not bad for a £40 replacement panel filter.
Regards,
Shaun.
Regards,
Shaun.
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: www.ukscoobies.com
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
am i safe in saying then if i put a k&n panel filter in my99 then the maf will live to fight another day? Its jsut shes going for a remap nxt year and i wanna start getting bits gradual.
filter
fuel pump
decat
then downpipe day of the remap
filter
fuel pump
decat
then downpipe day of the remap
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well i got my full decat a few days before the k&n air filter, and even for a second hand one you could tell the difference. for starters theres a swoosh noise from the filter that wasnt audiable before and the turbo loves it and spoos quicker and louder too. all in all probably the most sensible mod il do to the scoob, besides the remap and bigger brakes lol
andy
andy
#22
Just to clear up a few facts then, a K&N panel filter would be a safe and wise decision? Some people in the past have said using an 'oiled' one can cause problems?
I've on 04 WRX.
I've on 04 WRX.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Solihull
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shaun
The pressure drop across the std paper filter is less than .01 Bar as were some of the other filters so there's nothing to be gained by fitting something less restrictive. Maybe something else is giving the extra power like a small change in flow past the sensor and a slightly leaner mixture although this wasn't borne out in our engine dyno testing.
Mike
The pressure drop across the std paper filter is less than .01 Bar as were some of the other filters so there's nothing to be gained by fitting something less restrictive. Maybe something else is giving the extra power like a small change in flow past the sensor and a slightly leaner mixture although this wasn't borne out in our engine dyno testing.
Mike
#24
Twatful
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Grew up and don't drive Scoobs anymore!
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
K&N's are only very lightly oiled, ran one for ages in my MY99 with no problems.
Old ITG, Ramair were foam and covered in a thick sludge.
HKS and Blitz SUS could not filter a brick.
Old ITG, Ramair were foam and covered in a thick sludge.
HKS and Blitz SUS could not filter a brick.
#25
Originally Posted by MikeWood
Shaun
The pressure drop across the std paper filter is less than .01 Bar as were some of the other filters so there's nothing to be gained by fitting something less restrictive. Maybe something else is giving the extra power like a small change in flow past the sensor and a slightly leaner mixture although this wasn't borne out in our engine dyno testing.
Mike
The pressure drop across the std paper filter is less than .01 Bar as were some of the other filters so there's nothing to be gained by fitting something less restrictive. Maybe something else is giving the extra power like a small change in flow past the sensor and a slightly leaner mixture although this wasn't borne out in our engine dyno testing.
Mike
Nope wasnt any leaning of mixture..... AFR's were exactly the same on the wideband sensor. Believe me...... we checked everything. We even put a brand new OEM filter in to check it was like for like (i.e. new vs new).
Regards,
Shaun.
Last edited by ex-webby; 29 September 2006 at 10:54 AM.
#28
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM