Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

V-Power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07 November 2006 | 04:18 PM
  #1  
Onan The Barbarian's Avatar
Onan The Barbarian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,098
Likes: 1
From: Hades.....Seventh Level.....Ask for Wingnut
Default V-Power

I've just filled up with my first tank of V-Power in my Jap Import Classic

Anyone had any experience with this stuff?

It smelt a bit funky when I was filling up
Old 07 November 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #2  
Martin WRX22's Avatar
Martin WRX22
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
Default

Originally Posted by Onan The Barbarian
I've just filled up with my first tank of V-Power in my Jap Import Classic

Anyone had any experience with this stuff?

It smelt a bit funky when I was filling up
Just put my 1st tank full intoday aswell.

I thought the smell was my underpants as I was touching cloth as I was well out of fuel.
Old 07 November 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #3  
bobthebodger's Avatar
bobthebodger
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: manchester
Default

Ive put many a tank of v poer in and found no problems at all.
Old 07 November 2006 | 04:46 PM
  #4  
alloy's Avatar
alloy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 0
From: Shell petrol station
Default

V-power only fuel my scoob drinks
Old 07 November 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #5  
EddScott's Avatar
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,574
Likes: 64
From: West Wales
Default

Only used Optimax so therefore only use V-Power.

Only discernable (sp) difference is MPG. Car is using more with V-Power than it did with Optimax. Was mapped with Optimax in it so maybe that has something to do with it.

Don't think its worth re-mapping though.
Old 07 November 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
mgcvk's Avatar
mgcvk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 9
Default

As above, my car was mapped on Optimax and mpg has dropped significantly with V Power. I'm using Tesco 99 as often as possible and might go back to Esso super as well as car runs well on it.
Old 07 November 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #7  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Why do we need to wait so long between V-Power threads ?

Can we have a rota ?
Old 07 November 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #8  
Scooby-doo97's Avatar
Scooby-doo97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 20
From: Internet
Default

Originally Posted by EddScott
Only used Optimax so therefore only use V-Power.

Only discernable (sp) difference is MPG. Car is using more with V-Power than it did with Optimax. Was mapped with Optimax in it so maybe that has something to do with it.

Don't think its worth re-mapping though.
Mate, I have the same issue. Got better MPG on Optimax too
Old 07 November 2006 | 05:29 PM
  #9  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by Scooby-doo97
Mate, I have the same issue. Got better MPG on Optimax too
How much difference do you notice ? Is your car mapped for Optimax ?
Old 07 November 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #10  
Scooby-doo97's Avatar
Scooby-doo97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 20
From: Internet
Default

There is **** all difference More activity on the knocklink and I'm still using NF octane booster.
Old 07 November 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #11  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Difference as in reduction in mpg - how far you get on a tank on each ?

Is the car mapped and what year is it ?
Old 07 November 2006 | 07:48 PM
  #12  
EddScott's Avatar
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,574
Likes: 64
From: West Wales
Default

MY00 decat and panel filter and TEK mapping. Don't know precisely but MPG has blatantly reduced and I would say it pops and bangs more so I guess its runnning richer since the change.

These are just my findings. I'm sure they'll be others who won't have any issues with it.
Old 07 November 2006 | 08:28 PM
  #13  
Scooby-doo97's Avatar
Scooby-doo97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 20
From: Internet
Default

Originally Posted by andythejock01wrx
Difference as in reduction in mpg - how far you get on a tank on each ?

Is the car mapped and what year is it ?
The maximum I've had is 200 miles on a tank (using ****-Power, sorry V-Power). Last time round only did 183 and that was all motorway driving with the odd blast here and there. On Optimax I got above 250 easily. There is no difference in performance, still has all the go I'm pretty sure the last owner had it mapped on Optimax - will have to give him a call.

Car is a MY99 type R
Old 07 November 2006 | 08:59 PM
  #14  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

Originally Posted by Onan The Barbarian
I've just filled up with my first tank of V-Power in my Jap Import Classic

Anyone had any experience with this stuff?

It smelt a bit funky when I was filling up
How can you have so many posts on Scoobynet and not be aware of all the threads there have been on this subject?
JohnD
Old 07 November 2006 | 11:21 PM
  #15  
mgcvk's Avatar
mgcvk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 9
Default

I know this has been done loads already. However, Optimax seemed a really good compromise for performance when giving it some welly and decent mpg on motorway cruisin'. I could easily get 350 miles out of a 60 litre tank in '03 wrx when on motorway journeys. V power is still great for performance, but I'm lucky to get 260/270 miles per tank now when tootling along. I know you don't buy these cars for fuel economy blah etc!
Old 08 November 2006 | 12:15 AM
  #16  
thrustylusty's Avatar
thrustylusty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

I smell a lot funky when I've been filled up but what's that got to do with the car?
Old 08 November 2006 | 12:16 AM
  #17  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Could this be because of the ECU on the Classics, which takes longer to adjust to a different octane rating ?
Old 08 November 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #18  
thrustylusty's Avatar
thrustylusty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

Hey Andy the Jock, does ECU stand for endless co** ups?
Old 08 November 2006 | 08:53 AM
  #19  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by thrustylusty
Hey Andy the Jock, does ECU stand for endless co** ups?
Electronic Control Unit, but could be Endless ****-ups in your case !
Old 08 November 2006 | 09:11 AM
  #20  
pippyrips's Avatar
pippyrips
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 0
From: Bebind the wheel of my red rice rocket
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
How can you have so many posts on Scoobynet and not be aware of all the threads there have been on this subject?
JohnD
Old 08 November 2006 | 04:44 PM
  #21  
Onan The Barbarian's Avatar
Onan The Barbarian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,098
Likes: 1
From: Hades.....Seventh Level.....Ask for Wingnut
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
How can you have so many posts on Scoobynet and not be aware of all the threads there have been on this subject?
JohnD
It's called laziness
Old 24 January 2007 | 07:48 PM
  #22  
bohnjegley's Avatar
bohnjegley
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: the big smoke 12.79@103mph
Default

use this seems alright

Sunoco 260 GT100 Locations
Consumer Products & Services » Race Fuels » Sunoco 260 GT100 Locations





Overview
Sunoco 260 GT™ 100, which has the highest octane rating of any street legal fuel, is now available at selected retail locations.
Sunoco 260 GT 100 is designed for high performance street cars, muscle cars, classics, street rods, motorcycles, karts and marine applications. Sunoco 260 GT 100 contains no metallic compounds to harm catalytic converters or oxygen sensors. It contains a comprehensive additive package for greater engine protection and reduced fuel system deposits. Sunoco 260 GT 100 is also compatible with virtually all two-stroke synthetic and mineral based motor oils.



Sunoco 260 GT 100 Unleaded is available at selected locations throughout the U.K. In certain areas, Sunoco 260 GT 100 Unleaded is available under the CAM2 GTTM 100 label.
Old 24 January 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #23  
dnc's Avatar
dnc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Default

When v power 1st came out everyone seemed to be saying better performance and better economy. WTF, thinks I!! Good to see a few now saying they are getting worse economy, like I seem to . Don't think mine was mapped for opti before that, but seemed better.
Old 24 January 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #24  
tan v5sti's Avatar
tan v5sti
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

v5 sti runnin on v power get 51 miles 2a tenner wich i reckon iz good.did 210 miles on motorway with 29 pound vpower
Old 24 January 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #25  
Scoobywrx1979's Avatar
Scoobywrx1979
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Rotherham
Default

Mine was mapped on v power n gets same mpg as i did with optimax. Still get average of 260 miles tank full at running at 331 bhp no probs here
Old 25 January 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #26  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Default

Originally Posted by Scoobywrx1979
Mine was mapped on v power n gets same mpg as i did with optimax. Still get average of 260 miles tank full at running at 331 bhp no probs here
Basically the same here, although I have lost a few mpg but last round of mods/map coincided with change to v-power, so difficult to say if it was purely down to fuel. Used to get around 24mpg on Optimax and now ~22mpg, however now running ~340bhp v's 276 before, so I'd say on balance consumption hasn't changed..
Old 25 January 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #27  
downs523's Avatar
downs523
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: dunstable
Default

Originally Posted by Scoobywrx1979
Mine was mapped on v power n gets same mpg as i did with optimax. Still get average of 260 miles tank full at running at 331 bhp no probs here
thats well good mate i get roughly 180-220 on my sti ppp 03 reg, what am i doin wrong, this is with normal driving, most moterway, do i need a remap, sum1 please pm me thanks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
09 January 2016 05:42 PM
walterwhite
ScoobyNet General
18
16 September 2015 11:05 AM
Jonty
ScoobyNet General
37
29 September 2006 01:24 AM
Nick_Scooby
General Technical
2
26 August 2006 08:45 PM



Quick Reply: V-Power



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 PM.