Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

0-60 for bugeye wrx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 December 2006, 10:32 PM
  #1  
D.O.M
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
D.O.M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 0-60 for bugeye wrx

Just wanted to know the exact figures for bugeye wrx 0-60...

are they slower than the blobs?
Old 29 December 2006, 02:28 PM
  #2  
Barmyclown
Scooby Regular
 
Barmyclown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lincoln, Yes I know it's Pink
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The quoted figure is 5.9 I think the blobs do 5.5. But can't see how an extra 10hp 10lb/ft of torque knocks .4 of a second off the 0-60 time.

Jase
Old 29 December 2006, 02:29 PM
  #3  
cookstar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
cookstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stroke it baby!
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boobiman
Just wanted to know the exact figures for bugeye wrx 0-60...

are they slower than the blobs?

Yes they are slower than the Blob WRX,
Old 29 December 2006, 02:38 PM
  #4  
scoobboy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
scoobboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 4,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Barmyclown
The quoted figure is 5.9 I think the blobs do 5.5. But can't see how an extra 10hp 10lb/ft of torque knocks .4 of a second off the 0-60 time.

Jase
Yeah but god knows how many gearboxes, clutches etc they wrecked to get 5.9 time, would say nearer 7 secs
Old 29 December 2006, 02:48 PM
  #5  
Gaz7612
Scooby Regular
 
Gaz7612's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd have to agree with scoobboy no idea how they got 5.9 out of a standard bugeye wrx
Old 29 December 2006, 02:50 PM
  #6  
B9GLY
Scooby Regular
 
B9GLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would say approx 6.5 is more realistic
Old 29 December 2006, 03:01 PM
  #7  
cookstar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
cookstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stroke it baby!
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

These estimated times wil vary wildly from driver to driver

Trending Topics

Old 29 December 2006, 03:08 PM
  #8  
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gaz-wrx-bugeye
I'd have to agree with scoobboy no idea how they got 5.9 out of a standard bugeye wrx
By launching it from 5k, which you can't do on a fwd. I think Scooby 0-60 times as a wholecan be a bit misleading. 0-100 is better, or in gear 30-70.
Old 29 December 2006, 03:12 PM
  #9  
Bug Eyed Peas
Scooby Regular
 
Bug Eyed Peas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: York Scoobs. . . . Onwards & Upwards
Posts: 4,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Won`t it also depend on the stature of the driver & the amount of fuel in the tank? Power to weight ratio? Just a thought.
Old 29 December 2006, 03:15 PM
  #10  
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bug Eyed Peas
Won`t it also depend on the stature of the driver & the amount of fuel in the tank? Power to weight ratio? Just a thought.
Yes, as long as they're in proportion, drivers of lesser stature will be able to get their car to go quicker.
Old 29 December 2006, 03:15 PM
  #11  
B9GLY
Scooby Regular
 
B9GLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

at the end of the day, evo mag tested them and the clio 172 cup was faster from 0-100 iirc
Old 29 December 2006, 03:17 PM
  #12  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i managed 4.4 from a 285bhp blob, 5.5 is a doddle!
Old 29 December 2006, 03:22 PM
  #13  
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by B9GLY
at the end of the day, evo mag tested them and the clio 172 cup was faster from 0-100 iirc
The current edition of Evo doesn't list the bug, but it does show the 03 WRX.
They got a 0-100 of 15.7secs when they tested it, 17.7secs for the Clio Cup.

Mind you, I don't think anyone here is claiming that the bug WRX is superquick - I did modify mine after all !!
Old 29 December 2006, 03:23 PM
  #14  
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Neilo
well i managed 4.4 from a 285bhp blob, 5.5 is a doddle!
0-100 ?!
Old 29 December 2006, 06:05 PM
  #15  
Barmyclown
Scooby Regular
 
Barmyclown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lincoln, Yes I know it's Pink
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andythejock01wrx
Mind you, I don't think anyone here is claiming that the bug WRX is superquick - I did modify mine after all !!
If your used to them it`s not, I was in awe when I got mine, and got it past it`s run in period. It took me over 6 months to even start to get used to how quick it is. The thing that really scared me was you would be sat on a road thinking you were doing 60, and you weren`t you were going faster than this a lot faster. But now it feels normal, everyone else comments when you put your foot down , and i`m sat in the driving seat thinking I need more power. But sitting at 60 still feels like your doing 40.

I know this may sound like me trying to big up the bug. And it is the second time I have bought it up, but I don't think there is enough difference between the bug and the first gen blobs to 60, 4 tenths of a second faster. if you look at the figures they have a power increase of less than 5% to increase acceleration by nearly 7%. People are also forgetting about a modification to the bug between my01 and my02. apart from removing the radio antenna to the rear window from the a-pillar. They also changed the map and Up-pipe. I remember this because it happend a few weeks after I had ordered mine from europe, and I was hoping I was going to get the new one instead of being palmed off with the older my01. I have had a comment that mine felt faster than someone elses bug by a passenger. But don`t know whether the other was an MY01.

As people have stated before they feel that the classics 0-60 time felt conservative to quoted figures. Maybe the bugeye and blobeye is not that much differant to 60 maybe a couple of tenths and they pulled a fast one with the quoted figures for insurance purposes as the bugs are IG 19D`ish. Maybe if they quoted nearer mid 5 to 60 it was going to end up in 20, which would put it the same as the STI. Why buy a wrx if it is going to cost the same to insure as the sti. You might aswell save up and buy the sti.

Jase

[flame suit at the ready]
Old 29 December 2006, 07:00 PM
  #16  
BigAl024
Scooby Regular
 
BigAl024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dundee
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was disappointed with my bugeye WRX when i got it. I just expected it to feel quicker. The car I went from, was a Clio 172 cup. I've now got a Bugeye STi with prodrive kit, and I cant believe the difference from the WRX. Yes, I know its got about 80bhp more, but boy the difference is night/day. Long and short of it from me is : If you can afford to get WRX with PPP, go for it - You wont be disappointed!
Old 29 December 2006, 07:04 PM
  #17  
Abdabz
Scooby Regular
 
Abdabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5.9 is the closest thing to an actual fact after 17 replies, Mr Boobiman (nice name by the way, I like boobies)...
Apologies for the ramblings and imminent debate on what to get/not to get/whats faster than what etc... It's something you'll get used to
Old 29 December 2006, 07:10 PM
  #18  
Bug Eyed Peas
Scooby Regular
 
Bug Eyed Peas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: York Scoobs. . . . Onwards & Upwards
Posts: 4,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To be honest I don`t care about 0-60 times. I just love driving the car.
Anthony
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonMc
Subaru Parts
22
06 February 2016 09:50 PM
slimwiltaz
ScoobyNet General
47
28 September 2015 08:43 PM



Quick Reply: 0-60 for bugeye wrx



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06 PM.