Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

S204 Vs Type RA-R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 April 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
EddScott's Avatar
EddScott
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,574
Likes: 64
From: West Wales
Default S204 Vs Type RA-R

So which is considered the better one to have then?

Not that I'm in the market for one (sadly) but if I were which should I be looking at?

What are the differences between the two?

I would have asked on the other thread about who wants one but that seemed to go downhill.
Old 21 April 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #2  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Edd (?).

My fave is the S204, spec below (amazing car!):

STi Releases Limited Edition S204 (600 units available)

TX.

PS

Those seats ...
Old 21 April 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #3  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Here's the Spec C RA-R for you:

First Drive: Subaru Impreza WRX STI Spec C Type RA-R

TX.
Old 21 April 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #4  
rcwhite's Avatar
rcwhite
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Default

the only thing that pisses me off about the s204 is why the bloody hell was it made with the sti shell and not the spec c .

but both cars are amazing any way
Old 21 April 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #5  
Luminous's Avatar
Luminous
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
From: Muppetising life
Default

Special sound proofing in the floor of the S204, why would you want that

Whole point is that its a more focused car, noise is a plus, especially if it drowns out all the rattles
Old 21 April 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #6  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by rcwhite
the only thing that pisses me off about the s204 is why the bloody hell was it made with the sti shell and not the spec c .

but both cars are amazing any way

They all have the same shell its the subframe thats the biggest difference.

Now it really does depend on what you want, the S204 runs the same engine, has the same engine and oil coolers etc but also has the extra sound proofing, heavier subframe etc, the RA-R is probably a slightly more focused car, having the different subframe and lacking the soundproofing.

Tony
Old 21 April 2007 | 10:41 PM
  #7  
MrRA's Avatar
MrRA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
Default

I was under the impression that MY05 cars onwards had the same subframe as the Spec C, which gives an increase in wheel base.

Therefore the S204 would share that same subframe. It would be the loss of sound deadening, lightweight panels etc that would allow a Spec C to weigh less.

The 'S' series cars are now STI's way of producing cars that have the 'go' as well as some creature comforts, like BMW's 'M' cars.

Spec C is the starting point for GrpN and therefore does without any creature comforts and is a more focused car, something that not everyone can live with on day to day use.
Old 21 April 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #8  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

^^ My Spec C is fecking noisy ...






... still love it though

TX.
Old 21 April 2007 | 11:29 PM
  #9  
alci's Avatar
alci
BANNED
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: cuckoo land
Default

nice mota terminator x. ya lucky bastad ya
Old 21 April 2007 | 11:41 PM
  #10  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by MrRA
I was under the impression that MY05 cars onwards had the same subframe as the Spec C, which gives an increase in wheel base.

Therefore the S204 would share that same subframe. It would be the loss of sound deadening, lightweight panels etc that would allow a Spec C to weigh less.

The 'S' series cars are now STI's way of producing cars that have the 'go' as well as some creature comforts, like BMW's 'M' cars.

Spec C is the starting point for GrpN and therefore does without any creature comforts and is a more focused car, something that not everyone can live with on day to day use.

Its not the subframe it was the geometry that was different, the subframe on the spec c is somewhat different because it removes a rather large piece of metal (which is heavy) hence you get the weight savings.
The spec c still has a different subframe, suspension etc over the standard sti.

Tony
Old 22 April 2007 | 06:12 PM
  #11  
jeremy's Avatar
jeremy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Default

From the best I've been able to glean
the new 08' impreza's will not have a
front sub-frame at all- hence the low weight.
Old 22 April 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #12  
Luminous's Avatar
Luminous
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
From: Muppetising life
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
the subframe on the spec c is somewhat different because it removes a rather large piece of metal (which is heavy)
How do they manage to get away with reomving this rather large piece of metal. I mean, they are not going to fit ballast to the STi just to slow it down, it must have been doing something useful?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
makkink
General Technical
10
01 October 2015 05:41 PM
Tidgy
Member's Gallery
13
01 October 2015 08:25 AM
yabbadoo4
ScoobyNet General
11
30 September 2015 10:33 PM
Phil3822
General Technical
0
30 September 2015 06:29 PM



Quick Reply: S204 Vs Type RA-R



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 PM.