e36 m3 vs m3 evolution
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kingswood Bristol
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
e36 m3 vs m3 evolution
Does anybody no what the differences there are between the E36 M3 convertible and the E36 M3 evo convertible? I no the normal M3 is 286bhp and the evo is 320ish. But is it noticable on the road? Does anyone no of any videos of both of them together or have any performance stats for both?
Also other than perfomance are there any other differences? Might be selling my v7 sti to buy one. Can't afford the petrol using mine!
Also other than perfomance are there any other differences? Might be selling my v7 sti to buy one. Can't afford the petrol using mine!
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kingswood Bristol
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It does sound strange I no. But owner reviews all report combined mpg of around 26-28 and better again on a run. A friend of mine has a normal M3 and his is considerably cheaper to run than my STI.
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kingswood Bristol
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I no normal M3's are quick. I always gain 3-4 car lengths of the mark and then it seems pretty even all the way. Would be interesting to no what would happen with an M3 Evo though.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I could easily get 30mpg-35mpg on the short 10 mile journey to and from work up the motorway.
That car cost me LOTS less to run and insure than my scoob and was more reliable
Here's a short clip of my M3 running up Santa Pod: YouTube - My BMW E36 M3 @ Santa Pod-Ultimate Street Car '06
Also,the M3 Evo is quoted as 321bhp but it isn't that much-usually only makes around 290-300bhp on the Dyno. There really is no difference between the 3.0 and the 3.2 on the road.
The 3.0 has a stronger engine(single vanos) and a stronger gearbox.
Last edited by 340BHP-WRX; 27 June 2007 at 09:40 PM.
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kingswood Bristol
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My old E36 M3 3.0 had a few mods and was running 316bhp-up from 286bhp.
I could easily get 30mpg-35mpg on the short 10 mile journey to and from work up the motorway.
That car cost me LOTS less to run and insure than my scoob and was more reliable
Here's a short clip of my M3 running up Santa Pod: YouTube - My BMW E36 M3 @ Santa Pod-Ultimate Street Car '06
I could easily get 30mpg-35mpg on the short 10 mile journey to and from work up the motorway.
That car cost me LOTS less to run and insure than my scoob and was more reliable
Here's a short clip of my M3 running up Santa Pod: YouTube - My BMW E36 M3 @ Santa Pod-Ultimate Street Car '06
#11
Much nicer to drive 5 speed is just right, the ratio's on the WEAKER 6 speed box are all wrong.
Also there is a weird device fitted to the clutch to stop you hammering it in 1st, cuts the power
The twin vanos on the 3.2 evo is crap, they will all fail at some point and at 2k or there abouts for a new unit fitted it's not cheap, so will go after only a couple of thousand miles, others will do over 100k.
On the road there is no noticable difference in power, except a 3.0 will pull away faster from the lights as it doesn't have anything limiting the power in 1st gear.
Hope that helps.
Oh and M3's cost alot less to own and maintain than any turbo car i've had.
Just don't take them to bmw for the servicing and it will be a very cheap performance car.
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kingswood Bristol
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having owned both, I can tell you the 3.0 is the far better car.
Much nicer to drive 5 speed is just right, the ratio's on the WEAKER 6 speed box are all wrong.
Also there is a weird device fitted to the clutch to stop you hammering it in 1st, cuts the power
The twin vanos on the 3.2 evo is crap, they will all fail at some point and at 2k or there abouts for a new unit fitted it's not cheap, so will go after only a couple of thousand miles, others will do over 100k.
On the road there is no noticable difference in power, except a 3.0 will pull away faster from the lights as it doesn't have anything limiting the power in 1st gear.
Hope that helps.
Oh and M3's cost alot less to own and maintain than any turbo car i've had.
Just don't take them to bmw for the servicing and it will be a very cheap performance car.
Much nicer to drive 5 speed is just right, the ratio's on the WEAKER 6 speed box are all wrong.
Also there is a weird device fitted to the clutch to stop you hammering it in 1st, cuts the power
The twin vanos on the 3.2 evo is crap, they will all fail at some point and at 2k or there abouts for a new unit fitted it's not cheap, so will go after only a couple of thousand miles, others will do over 100k.
On the road there is no noticable difference in power, except a 3.0 will pull away faster from the lights as it doesn't have anything limiting the power in 1st gear.
Hope that helps.
Oh and M3's cost alot less to own and maintain than any turbo car i've had.
Just don't take them to bmw for the servicing and it will be a very cheap performance car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DazV
Computer & Technology Related
14
25 June 2002 06:41 PM