Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

More advice needed ! 2.0 or 2.5 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10 July 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #1  
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
340BHP-WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Default More advice needed ! 2.0 or 2.5 ?

Following my previous thread about choosing a 2.0 rebuild or 2.5 I have been given a full estimate for both builds and need some more advice on which way to go ?

Details of both builds:
2.0-My exisiting unit rebuilt with fully forged internals to be capable of handling 400-450bhp using ACL main bearings,ACL big end bearings,Wiseco pistons,Fast road rod set(unsure of brand). Supply TD05 18g turbo.
Remap Power FC-predicted power 350bhp/350 ft lbs but could be closer to 400bhp with the other mods I have fitted.

Fitted price including vat,turbo and remap etc: £3726.01


2.5 Build.
2.5 Sti block capable of handling upto 400bhp,with my existing TD05 and current mods predicted power is 330bhp/370 ft lbs-earlier than the 2.0 and a wider torque spread.

Fitted price including vat and full remap: £3556.91

Advice on both options would be great.

I was pretty sure I wanted the 2.5 but have been told it's nowhere near as strong as the forged 2.0 will be and also with the extra torque of the 2.5 it'll probably kill my gearbox sooner !
Old 10 July 2007 | 11:19 PM
  #2  
Slowboy Racing's Avatar
Slowboy Racing
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: 10.68 QT mile in 2007 2.33 Type R ** Current 2002 Spec C 2.33 Track prepped.
Default

Based on the above i would go with the 2lt
Old 10 July 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #3  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

I'm not being funny but, why would you spend £3500 on an 11 year old car?

Why not move on and spend your money on a newer car. (whats the value of your car as it stands?)

Sooner or later you will want to sell up anyway, and you'll never get that £3500 back
Old 10 July 2007 | 11:34 PM
  #4  
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
340BHP-WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I'm not being funny but, why would you spend £3500 on an 11 year old car?

Why not move on and spend your money on a newer car. (whats the value of your car as it stands?)

Sooner or later you will want to sell up anyway, and you'll never get that £3500 back
Because I haven't had the car very long and don't really want to sell it on.

For £3500 I will have around a 400bhp Impreza which has everything else to match such as suspension etc.

I'm aware I won't get the £3500 back but that's not an issue really.

I've been offered £4000 for the car as it stands but can't really find anything else that i'm interested in !
Old 10 July 2007 | 11:48 PM
  #5  
Jay m A's Avatar
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 1
From: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Default

I take it you have the original heads so a redline of 7400 rpm?

Looking at your profile you already have a gearbox that should handle the torque so I'd go for the 2.5

Whilst you're there spend another £600 on some pistons to make it future turbo proof - with hindsight I wish I did when I got my 257 a couple of years back
Old 11 July 2007 | 12:18 AM
  #6  
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
340BHP-WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Default

Originally Posted by Jay m A
I take it you have the original heads so a redline of 7400 rpm?

Looking at your profile you already have a gearbox that should handle the torque so I'd go for the 2.5

Whilst you're there spend another £600 on some pistons to make it future turbo proof - with hindsight I wish I did when I got my 257 a couple of years back
Some people say the Sti 5 'box won't last long with the 2.5 !
Old 11 July 2007 | 12:51 AM
  #7  
bighead's Avatar
bighead
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by 340BHP-WRX
Because I haven't had the car very long and don't really want to sell it on.

For £3500 I will have around a 400bhp Impreza which has everything else to match such as suspension etc.

I'm aware I won't get the £3500 back but that's not an issue really.

I've been offered £4000 for the car as it stands but can't really find anything else that i'm interested in !
well typed
Old 11 July 2007 | 10:37 AM
  #8  
Neil..'s Avatar
Neil..
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Default

A 2.0 with approx 350 bhp is good...

A 2.5 with 350 bhp is even better, due to the increased torque...

You are right in that a forged 2.0 is stronger than a std STi 2.5 bottom end...

BUT, if you are after more than 350bhp, then simply put a set of pistons in the 2.5 and you have the basis for a good useable, reliable 400/400 motor..

For road use, you simply can't beat the grunt of the 2.5
Old 11 July 2007 | 11:42 AM
  #9  
Jay m A's Avatar
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 1
From: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Default

Originally Posted by 340BHP-WRX
Some people say the Sti 5 'box won't last long with the 2.5 !
You don't have to map the 2.5 for the gearbox breaking torque though. You could map the 2.5 to give the same torque as the 2.0 to make it gearbox friendly, but it will come in earlier and be a nicer drive.

Also IMO the 2.0 build needs better heads to get the most out of it - the short engine might be capable of 450+ but the heads won't be.

If you really think that 380 - 400 HP is as far as you'll ever take the engine then a stock 2.5 is the way to go IMO with your heads. If you can stretch another £600 for the pistons then all the better.
Old 11 July 2007 | 02:06 PM
  #10  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by 340BHP-WRX
Because I haven't had the car very long and don't really want to sell it on.

For £3500 I will have around a 400bhp Impreza which has everything else to match such as suspension etc.

I'm aware I won't get the £3500 back but that's not an issue really.

I've been offered £4000 for the car as it stands but can't really find anything else that i'm interested in !
OK then, so from personal experience for everyday road use I'd go for the 2.5l engine, it's just so much more civilised. If you want the car more for the track and drag strip then it has to be the 2lt.

Cheers

Martin
Old 11 July 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #11  
The rookie's Avatar
The rookie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Warwickshire, UK
Default

To me the choice depends on your use, if its a second 'fun' car you only drive at weekends, I think you'll get more smiles/mileout of the 2.0, as a daily driver commuting etc, the lazier nature of the 2.5 would probably be preferable to the all or nothing 2.0.

Simon
Old 11 July 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #12  
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
340BHP-WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Default

Thanks for the replies guys.

I really have a dilemma now as I can't choose between the 2 options !

There's so many pro's and con's for each
Old 12 July 2007 | 04:30 AM
  #13  
Neil..'s Avatar
Neil..
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Default

It's a shame you couldn't have a drive of the 2 optoins TBH...

I have a 2.5, 420-450 bhp, and a friend of mine has a 2.0 with 420 bhp..

The difference in driving on the road is unreal...

Good luck m8
Old 12 July 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #14  
automodellistagt's Avatar
automodellistagt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by E_M_B
It's a shame you couldn't have a drive of the 2 optoins TBH...

I have a 2.5, 420-450 bhp, and a friend of mine has a 2.0 with 420 bhp..

The difference in driving on the road is unreal...

Good luck m8
can you give a quick insight?
Old 12 July 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #15  
Neil..'s Avatar
Neil..
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by automodellistagt
can you give a quick insight?
Yup, the 2.5 is head and shoulders above the 2.0..
Old 12 July 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #16  
lunar tick's Avatar
lunar tick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
From: Northumberland
Default

I think he's asking in what what way is it head and shoulders above the 2.0L? - I'd be interested to hear too...
Old 12 July 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #17  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Its the faster response and torque delivery of the 2.5 that does it for me.

The difference is like having filled your car with 3 fat blokes when jumping from a 2.5 to a 2.0 with similar power.

Andy
Old 12 July 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #18  
lunar tick's Avatar
lunar tick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
From: Northumberland
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Its the faster response and torque delivery of the 2.5 that does it for me.

The difference is like having filled your car with 3 fat blokes when jumping from a 2.5 to a 2.0 with similar power.

Andy
That's some difference - I can feel the difference when my slim and petite girlfriend is sitting in the passenger seat!
Old 12 July 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #19  
rossi_p's Avatar
rossi_p
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F

The difference is like having filled your car with 3 fat blokes when jumping from a 2.5 to a 2.0 with similar power.
Great explanation !!

I'd go with the 2.5 as well..
Old 12 July 2007 | 12:13 PM
  #20  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

2.5 everytime for me , FREE torque always makes me smile...
Old 12 July 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #21  
The rookie's Avatar
The rookie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Warwickshire, UK
Default

Originally Posted by lunar tick
That's some difference - I can feel the difference when my slim and petite girlfriend is sitting in the passenger seat!
Now that is open to many an interpretation

Actually I can when the missus is alongside, I get a punch when I start having too much fun!

Simon
Old 12 July 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #22  
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
340BHP-WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Default

The 2.5 sounds impressive but I have other things to take into account.

£4000 is really my max budget for this build-the 2.5 build is using the standard STI 2.5 short block and my standard TD05 turbo. If I start adding forged pistons and a better turbo it's going to be way over my budget !

Also,alot of people are telling me the 2.0 will be much stronger and potentially be more reliable than the 2.5.

Any thoughts on this ?
Old 12 July 2007 | 08:59 PM
  #23  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Ive got a 2.5 forge internals with uk standard heads, TD05 20g. 1bar of boost arrives at 2800rpm, with full boost coming just after 3000rpm. If you want low down grunt and the extra torque a 2.5 gives you over a 2.0 then there is no choice. However if you like to wait to near 4000rpm then have a punch as the turbo kicks in, get a 2.0 setup
Old 12 July 2007 | 09:17 PM
  #24  
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
340BHP-WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Ive got a 2.5 forge internals with uk standard heads, TD05 20g. 1bar of boost arrives at 2800rpm, with full boost coming just after 3000rpm. If you want low down grunt and the extra torque a 2.5 gives you over a 2.0 then there is no choice. However if you like to wait to near 4000rpm then have a punch as the turbo kicks in, get a 2.0 setup
Out of interest,how much did your forged 2.5 cost ?
Old 12 July 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #25  
Jay m A's Avatar
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 1
From: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Default

Looking at Zen's website

2.5 engine fitted £3046
Remap £329
Wiseco pistons £617

Thats £4k

Or you could forget the pistons and get your td05 converted to a 20g by Andy.F for £550 +VAT, thats another way of spending £4k

But I'd go with the pistons, enjoy the TD05 and upgrade the turbo at a later date when funds allow IMO
Old 12 July 2007 | 10:42 PM
  #26  
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
340BHP-WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Default

Are the rods in the 2.5 motor strong enough to justify just fitting forged pistons ?
Old 12 July 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #27  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

The weak point is the oe hypercuretic(SP) pistons not the rods being weak. 400/450 is quite comfortable with forge pistons and the original rods and crank ej257.

From memory the sti block and forge pistons cost £1900-2000+vat
Old 12 July 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #28  
Jay m A's Avatar
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 1
From: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Default

Good point, how long are you prepared to wait? With the strong £ to $ pop over to the axis website and import a ready built forged 2.5 short motor

AXIS POWER RACING- Stage 2 Motor

Last edited by Jay m A; 12 July 2007 at 11:01 PM.
Old 12 July 2007 | 11:19 PM
  #29  
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
340BHP-WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Default

Originally Posted by Jay m A
Good point, how long are you prepared to wait? With the strong £ to $ pop over to the axis website and import a ready built forged 2.5 short motor

AXIS POWER RACING- Stage 2 Motor
I would maybe do that but most tuners i've spoke to won't fit customer supplied parts !
Old 12 July 2007 | 11:29 PM
  #30  
GrimmSpeed's Avatar
GrimmSpeed
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, MN
Default

after i blew up my first 2.0 i went to a 2.5 and it was a world of difference as far as torque goes. i told myself i was never going back to a 2.0 after i drove the 2.5....but now i'm doing a 2.0 swap in the 96 impreza L.

basically, if you have the cash for a 2.5 GO FOR IT!!


Quick Reply: More advice needed ! 2.0 or 2.5 ?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 PM.