scoobyshop ,prozone fuel saver
20 August 2007 | 02:02 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: dundee
scoobyshop ,prozone fuel saver
whats your thoughts on this?
i would think if it works it would be fitted as standard by car manufacturers,i was surprised to find it in the scoobyshop here!
Welcome to ScoobyShop
i would think if it works it would be fitted as standard by car manufacturers,i was surprised to find it in the scoobyshop here!
Welcome to ScoobyShop
20 August 2007 | 02:39 AM
#2
Sounds crazy to me ...
TX.
PS
Like your car fella. Looks like my last one:
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-9/1084300/sub2.JPG
TX.
PS
Like your car fella. Looks like my last one:
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-9/1084300/sub2.JPG
Last edited by Terminator X; 20 August 2007 at 02:42 AM. Reason: viewed your Scooby!
even the foglight is in the same place
20 August 2007 | 09:19 AM
#5
Scooby Regular
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
> whats your thoughts on this?
Thoughts? Snake oil. Scam. Pseudo science mumbo jumbo. Gullible customers who don't understand junior school chemistry then try and justify their purchase with feedback letters designed to convince themselves they havn't been ripped off.
Same as loads of other similar devices with similar names, some variation on fuel catalyst being the usual.
Check out a US comment on a similar device here. And a general article covering the claims of such devices here.
DTI did a trial on these devices a while back and it ended up with some companies being prosecuted by the advertising standards people. But other companies claims are so vague they couldn't prosecute them. Some of the parasites cashing in on these devices now have the bare faced cheek to use selective quotes from the DTI tests as part of their sales literature.
Steer clear.
Thoughts? Snake oil. Scam. Pseudo science mumbo jumbo. Gullible customers who don't understand junior school chemistry then try and justify their purchase with feedback letters designed to convince themselves they havn't been ripped off.
Same as loads of other similar devices with similar names, some variation on fuel catalyst being the usual.
Check out a US comment on a similar device here. And a general article covering the claims of such devices here.
DTI did a trial on these devices a while back and it ended up with some companies being prosecuted by the advertising standards people. But other companies claims are so vague they couldn't prosecute them. Some of the parasites cashing in on these devices now have the bare faced cheek to use selective quotes from the DTI tests as part of their sales literature.
Steer clear.
Last edited by Chelspeed; 20 August 2007 at 09:40 AM.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
29 December 2015 12:07 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 08:03 AM