Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

type 20

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 January 2008 | 02:29 AM
  #1  
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Moscow
Question type 20

Lucky owners of Powerstation's Type 20 conversion, please share some expirience. How does it compare to the original character of the twinscroll? Whats turbo lag like? Did anyone upgrade the turbo described in the article?
I already have zerosports intake kit, HKS exhaust manifold + 3" Fujitsubo exhaust however the ECU is stock. On the site 400+ hp kit is offered and thats exactly what I want as my stage 1. Thinking of going forged later for 500 hp, but really want to see what standard internals can offer.
Old 29 January 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #2  
MrRA's Avatar
MrRA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
Default

Contact 'gussy'. He has had the 400bhp conversion fitted to his Spec C Type-RA and is best placed to tell you what the car feels like. I'm sure I remember him saying that it was spooling around 2-300rpm later, which is nothing really.
Old 29 January 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #3  
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Moscow
Default

Originally Posted by MrRA
Contact 'gussy'. I'm sure I remember him saying that it was spooling around 2-300rpm later, which is nothing really.
That is strange, I would expect the turbo to spool up the same if not earlier isn't it the beauty of twinscroll ?
Old 29 January 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #4  
GazTheHat's Avatar
GazTheHat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,638
Likes: 0
From: 392/361 MY04 STi
Default

Not if the turbo's getting bigger.
Old 29 January 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #5  
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Moscow
Default

Originally Posted by GazTheHat
Not if the turbo's getting bigger.
But isn't only the exhaust part of the turbo changed, the intake stays the same and therefore would offer same rate of spooling, right?

Last edited by Ilya; 29 January 2008 at 02:41 PM.
Old 29 January 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #6  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

My car (T25 so you may see this as not so relevant), has no noticeable lag at all, turbo spools at about 1600-1800 rpm, but runs out of puff at about 5,500rpm

Hope that helps
Old 29 January 2008 | 04:52 PM
  #7  
GazTheHat's Avatar
GazTheHat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,638
Likes: 0
From: 392/361 MY04 STi
Default

Originally Posted by Ilya
But isn't only the exhaust part of the turbo changed, the intake stays the same and therefore would offer same rate of spooling, right?
According to the spec the turbo is changed:

Stage 4: IHI Twin Scroll Garrett Core Hybrid Turbo,
650cc Injectors, Large Inlet Hose, EcuTek Re-Map,
Milltek Exhaust, K&N Filter
~400+bhp - £4249 + VAT

Unless we're on about two different things....
Old 29 January 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #8  
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Moscow
Default

Originally Posted by GazTheHat
According to the spec the turbo is changed:

Stage 4: IHI Twin Scroll Garrett Core Hybrid Turbo,
650cc Injectors, Large Inlet Hose, EcuTek Re-Map,
Milltek Exhaust, K&N Filter
~400+bhp - £4249 + VAT

Unless we're on about two different things....
If the IHI turbo on powerstation site is the same as the one described in the article, than we are talking about the same things.
Old 29 January 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #9  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Cost to power ratio that conversion is fairly expensive. Aftermarket twin scroll turbos aren't as common as the regular ones. If you really want to change turbos then I would probably suggest swapping up pipe and switching to non twin scroll turbo. I think your existing manifold and down pipe may be okay but not sure. If you source your own bits I'm sure you could get over 400 bhp for around two to two and a half K.
Old 29 January 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #10  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
My car (T25 so you may see this as not so relevant), has no noticeable lag at all, turbo spools at about 1600-1800 rpm, but runs out of puff at about 5,500rpm

Hope that helps
Where is the rev limiter set Martin ?
Old 29 January 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #11  
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Moscow
Default

I already have 650 PE injectors and Zerosports crank pulley waiting to be fitted, along with APS turbo inlet pipe and possibly turbo to tmic pipe on the way, so the only thing i need really are the turbo itself along with uprated actuator and updated ECU. Does anyone know if Powerstation do an upgrade to customer's turbo or some kind of exchange?
Old 29 January 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #12  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by andythejock01wrx
Where is the rev limiter set Martin ?
The rev limiter kick in at 8,250rpm, needless to say I've never got close to that
Old 29 January 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #13  
MrRA's Avatar
MrRA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
Default

The turbo used in the Powerstation 400bhp conversion is based on the MD321 I believe.
Old 29 January 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #14  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
The rev limiter kick in at 8,250rpm, needless to say I've never got close to that
Cheers Martin. Is the engine running out of puff an issue, or is the huge mid-range grunt perfect ?
Old 29 January 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #15  
MrRA's Avatar
MrRA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by andythejock01wrx
Cheers Martin. Is the engine running out of puff an issue, or is the huge mid-range grunt perfect ?
I would say it more down to the character of the 2.5 engine. Delivers it kick lower down the rev range and with the mid-range grunt there is probably no need to go higher. Whereas the EJ20 prefers to be revved more and therefore your always going into the 7.5k rpm region.
Old 29 January 2008 | 08:30 PM
  #16  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by andythejock01wrx
Cheers Martin. Is the engine running out of puff an issue, or is the huge mid-range grunt perfect ?
No not really, the only time I've ever seen it as a disadvantage was when I went to Santa Pod, too many gear changes needed.

The low & mid range on the T25 is unbelievable, 40mph in 6th gear, foot down and its really going strong, it drives more like a V8 than a 4 pot!

The only other thing that bugs me a bit is the short ratio's, you just run out of gears to throw the at torque.
Old 29 January 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #17  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Shift light set at 6800rpm for me ... peak BHP

TX.

Originally Posted by MrRA
Whereas the EJ20 prefers to be revved more and therefore your always going into the 7.5k rpm region.
Old 30 January 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #18  
MrRA's Avatar
MrRA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Shift light set at 6800rpm for me ... peak BHP

TX.
A little extra won't hurt. Go on, let her loose.
Old 30 January 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #19  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
No not really, the only time I've ever seen it as a disadvantage was when I went to Santa Pod, too many gear changes needed.

The low & mid range on the T25 is unbelievable, 40mph in 6th gear, foot down and its really going strong, it drives more like a V8 than a 4 pot!

The only other thing that bugs me a bit is the short ratio's, you just run out of gears to throw the at torque.
Cheers.
Old 30 January 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #20  
spec-cie's Avatar
spec-cie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default

Anyone considering or had the stage 2 to 4 upgrade? I've had the stage 2 on my spec C since I bought it and love the lack of lag and responsiveness from 1500 revs. Seriously thinking about the stage 4 but don't want an additional 50bhp if I lose some of the 'driveability' of the car.
Old 30 January 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #21  
spec-cie's Avatar
spec-cie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Shift light set at 6800rpm for me ... peak BHP

TX.
Yes, but you have less torque at the wheels in the next gear up ... take it to the 8000 redline like it wants you to!
Old 30 January 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #22  
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Moscow
Default

Originally Posted by spec-cie
Anyone considering or had the stage 2 to 4 upgrade? I've had the stage 2 on my spec C since I bought it and love the lack of lag and responsiveness from 1500 revs. Seriously thinking about the stage 4 but don't want an additional 50bhp if I lose some of the 'driveability' of the car.
+10000

This is exactly my feeling, I wouldn't want to loose any bit of spool there is now.
Old 30 January 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #23  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by spec-cie
Anyone considering or had the stage 2 to 4 upgrade? I've had the stage 2 on my spec C since I bought it and love the lack of lag and responsiveness from 1500 revs. Seriously thinking about the stage 4 but don't want an additional 50bhp if I lose some of the 'driveability' of the car.

Iain has been testing a new turbo, which he says is 'fantastic'
Old 30 January 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #24  
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Moscow
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Iain has been testing a new turbo, which he says is 'fantastic'

Any more details on this turbo?
Old 30 January 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #25  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Only that they've been testing it on 2lt cars and the Cosworth engine, and it apparently works a treat.

Iain said I should get 400bhp on my MK1 T25 with it.
Old 30 January 2008 | 10:33 PM
  #26  
gussy's Avatar
gussy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,536
Likes: 7
From: oop north in a spec-c.Now sold and starting on a classic ra track/sprint/road car
Default

Spec-cie I went from the stage 2 to stage 4 and for my needs which is a quick a to b car and the odd trackday thrown in its perfect if you lose any spool up I for one havent noticed it the main gain is the midrange/top end power right up to 8000 grand the rev limit light is set at 7600.
Old 30 January 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #27  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Question

Is there any benifit though apart from engine note as revs increase?

TX.

Originally Posted by MrRA
A little extra won't hurt. Go on, let her loose.
Old 31 January 2008 | 07:04 AM
  #28  
spec-cie's Avatar
spec-cie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Is there any benifit though apart from engine note as revs increase?

TX.
Better acceleration!

The point of peak power is not the optimal shift point, especially on turbo-charged cars (which tend to have flatter torque curves than NA cars). Even though the torque produced by the engine starts to drop off after the point of peak power, the effect of shifting up a gear reduces the torque by a much greater degree. So you will get greater acceleration at 7500 rpm in 2nd than you will at 4000 in 3rd

And the engine note is better.
Old 31 January 2008 | 08:04 AM
  #29  
XRS's Avatar
XRS
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 10
From: Suntrap of the South
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Only that they've been testing it on 2lt cars and the Cosworth engine, and it apparently works a treat.

Iain said I should get 400bhp on my MK1 T25 with it.
I take it you will need a new exhaust too to get that?
Old 31 January 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #30  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by XRS
I take it you will need a new exhaust too to get that?
No it's just a bolt on part, all you need is bigger injectors!

I looked into the GT series turbo a while back but was put of by the cost, because that did need lots of pipe work changes.

Iain is working out the costs, I PM when I know more


Quick Reply: type 20



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 AM.