Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Mitsubish FTO top speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 March 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #1  
dave247's Avatar
dave247
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Default Mitsubish FTO top speed

some lad at work has a mitsi fto and reckons it is running 340bhp and has done 174mph in it, anyone know what the top speed of these cars is?

its the 2.0 v6 mivec engine with aftermarket air filter
Old 19 March 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #2  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

it will need alot more mods than a air filter to get to 340, but that does sound high
Old 19 March 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #3  
dave247's Avatar
dave247
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Default

what about the top speed? my mates got a evo fq320 and i think that would struggle to do 174
Old 19 March 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #4  
Clarkie172's Avatar
Clarkie172
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: In a house
Default

fto? Theyre slow as ****! About 135 mph, their 0-60 is about 7.4 isnt it? imports around 6.5 sec

Last edited by Clarkie172; 19 March 2008 at 09:48 PM.
Old 19 March 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #5  
Norman Dog's Avatar
Norman Dog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 24
From: South Shields Tyne & Wear
Default

Originally Posted by Clarkie172
fto? Theyre slow as ****! their 0-60 is about 7.6 isnt it? imports around 6.5 sec

Were they not all imports?
Old 19 March 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #6  
Clarkie172's Avatar
Clarkie172
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: In a house
Default

I thought so mate but figures quote for non imports?
Old 19 March 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #7  
myblackwrx's Avatar
myblackwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 1
From: Dorset
Default

had a search came up with this 300+ bhp Mitsubishi FTO and this Mitsubishi : Mitsubishi FTO GPX Ralliart Mivec Turbo (reduced)
Old 19 March 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #8  
zs_phil's Avatar
zs_phil
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
From: yorkshire (mostly)
Default

he might of got 174 out of an imported fto he might not of changed the dials over to mph from kph
Old 19 March 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #9  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

174 kph is that around 112 mph....

Standard limiter for Japanese spec. cars.

LOL
Old 19 March 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #10  
Pumpkin's Avatar
Pumpkin
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

112mph if its got its 180kmh limiter on.
Old 19 March 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #11  
Prasius's Avatar
Prasius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Default

340bhp from a 2.0 NA engine.. someones been taking something illegal
Old 19 March 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #12  
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 14
From: To the valley men!
Default

Originally Posted by Norman Dog
Were they not all imports?
No Mitsubishi UK did sell a few to order, sadly, cost more than an import
Old 19 March 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #13  
RedScoob's Avatar
RedScoob
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Default

340hp? NA 2.0 V6? Ok, whatever. How quick does it get through a bottle of NO2?
Old 19 March 2008 | 10:43 PM
  #14  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

Nearly as quick as it melts it's front tyres...
Old 19 March 2008 | 10:45 PM
  #15  
Prasius's Avatar
Prasius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Default

Has he had any floor panels randomly drop out while achieving 174mph?

Old 19 March 2008 | 10:46 PM
  #16  
Luminous's Avatar
Luminous
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
From: Muppetising life
Default

they do sound nice though
Old 19 March 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #17  
M444GY's Avatar
M444GY
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (72)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,639
Likes: 0
From: MSOCs tyre and ROTA wheel dealer .Ruisliptyres@gmail.com
Default

i dunno but they are big ugly hunks of **** lol
Old 19 March 2008 | 11:47 PM
  #18  
Steve_PPP's Avatar
Steve_PPP
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
From: www.southeastscoobies.co.uk
Default

he's telling porkies, it would require bucket loads of cash to be thrown at the mivec engine to make 340bhp
Old 20 March 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #19  
Microstar's Avatar
Microstar
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Default

You wouldn't get that out of an FTO.
They are nice cars though and that V6 is a lovely motor.
I've had a UK turbo Impreza and an FTO. The FTO was as quick as the Impreza (only 2WD and a much lighter car) and IMHO the FTO is prettier than the Impreza...
Old 20 March 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #20  
Prasius's Avatar
Prasius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Microstar
the FTO is prettier than the Impreza...
Which is valid if your a hairdresser called Julian.



Old 20 March 2008 | 01:29 PM
  #21  
GC8's Avatar
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Default

V6 MIVEC 1999 MY cars were good for 200PS. Youll be lucky to see 200BHP here (and140mph), no matter what you add.....
Old 20 March 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #22  
fivetide's Avatar
fivetide
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
From: Central Scotland
Default

Nope totally agree with Microstar. I had one for about two years. 197 bhp standard, gorgeous induction and engine note. Usual iffy plastics interior but no worse than subaru at all.

Standard easy as quick as a wrx and i believe 50 -80 mph actually faster since it weighs little and revs to 8250rpm pulling strongly all the way through thanks to the MIVEC system.

Interesting handling too. for a FF car if you pushed it they actually lose the back end first. Catches people out. Still looks modern and in many ways resembles much newer and more expensive motors.

Electrics were a bit dodge though and early ones have a roof rust issue.

Ralliart cars were 'official imports' which means for the purposes of insurance they are still an import.

5t.
Old 20 March 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #23  
PeteBrant's Avatar
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
From: Worthing..
Default

Originally Posted by Steve_PPP
he's telling porkies, it would require bucket loads of cash to be thrown at the mivec engine to make 340bhp
Not to mention converting it to a rear wheel drive car if you actually want to be able to use said power
Old 20 March 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #24  
fivetide's Avatar
fivetide
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
From: Central Scotland
Default

I think a couple of the guys in the FTO OC were running that sort of power. One had a Galant VR4 twin turbo motor and the others were standard engines with a turbo on. All front wheel drive. Fastest was a tiptronic too. 0-60 in 5 or less i believe (depending on conditions)

5t.
Old 20 March 2008 | 02:19 PM
  #25  
Microstar's Avatar
Microstar
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Prasius
Which is valid if your a hairdresser called Julian.



No, valid whatever your name and occupation. The FTO has 'mini-Aston Martin' looks from the front. Imprezas (whichever model) are a bit ugly from most angles, if we're being honest. Its not really a valid comparison anyway, because the FTO is a coupe and the Impreza's a saloon.
Old 20 March 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #26  
Microstar's Avatar
Microstar
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fivetide
Nope totally agree with Microstar. I had one for about two years. 197 bhp standard, gorgeous induction and engine note. Usual iffy plastics interior but no worse than subaru at all.

Standard easy as quick as a wrx and i believe 50 -80 mph actually faster since it weighs little and revs to 8250rpm pulling strongly all the way through thanks to the MIVEC system.

Electrics were a bit dodge though and early ones have a roof rust issue.

Ralliart cars were 'official imports' which means for the purposes of insurance they are still an import.

5t.
I never heard of electrical issues (mine was 100% reliable). Roof rust affected certain colours IIRC (dark blue, black and burgundy).
Surprisingly quick little cars. Everybody I knew who owned one had nothing but good things to say about them and definitely one of the best cars I ever owned. Its a pity Mitsubishi never followed up with a newer version.
Old 20 March 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #27  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by Prasius
Which is valid if your a hairdresser called Julian.



Old 20 March 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #28  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by Microstar
No, valid whatever your name and occupation. The FTO has 'mini-Aston Martin' looks from the front. Imprezas (whichever model) are a bit ugly from most angles, if we're being honest. Its not really a valid comparison anyway, because the FTO is a coupe and the Impreza's a saloon.
Aye right !
Old 20 March 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #29  
fivetide's Avatar
fivetide
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
From: Central Scotland
Default

Originally Posted by Microstar
I never heard of electrical issues (mine was 100% reliable). Roof rust affected certain colours IIRC (dark blue, black and burgundy).
Surprisingly quick little cars. Everybody I knew who owned one had nothing but good things to say about them and definitely one of the best cars I ever owned. Its a pity Mitsubishi never followed up with a newer version.
Wrong i'm afraid. The roof rust was down to build dates. Early cars used a non water resistent bond to join the support bars to the roof skin. Mine had it and it was silver. Early Evo's/Lancers had the same problem.

Electrically, the climate control box goes wrong in a lot of them - lots of owners swapped them out. gain, exactly same unit as in the Evo.

Mine was brilliant though, fast, great to drive and very reliable. As you said, shame they never did another.

5t.
Old 20 March 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #30  
luckham's Avatar
luckham
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: La La Land
Default

174MPH PMSL! ~ the only way you'd get that kind of speed out of an FTO would be if you push one off a cliff..

Originally Posted by Microstar
No, valid whatever your name and occupation. The FTO has 'mini-Aston Martin' looks from the front. Imprezas (whichever model) are a bit ugly from most angles, if we're being honest. Its not really a valid comparison anyway, because the FTO is a coupe and the Impreza's a saloon.
Seeing as we're being honest ~ You've got to admit that they are a little bit ghey looking..

Stick up for yourself though mate, I would, there's nothing wrong with being in touch with your feminine side



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 AM.