Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

fast production subaru

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:04 AM
  #1  
shawnkng's Avatar
shawnkng
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: leeds
Default fast production subaru

hi all whats the fastest production subaru from standard car out of factory from classics 93 to todays models 08 just wanted to see that you guy think all the best
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:10 AM
  #2  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

WRX STI Spec C type RA-R is probably the fastest production car out of the factory with 320ps.

Tony
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:13 AM
  #3  
hux309's Avatar
hux309
Also known as daz
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 4
From: Cornwall
Default

22b
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:15 AM
  #4  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by hux309
22b
Nah, its about 2.5 secs slower to 100 than an RA-R

Tony
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:18 AM
  #5  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 7
From: Shropshire
Default

The Spec C itself must be second Tony??
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:19 AM
  #6  
shawnkng's Avatar
shawnkng
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: leeds
Default

hi there do you no the year of the WRX STI Spec C type RA-R i am doing a bit of research of all the subaru,s kind regards
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:21 AM
  #7  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Its a 2007 production run of 300.

Tony
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:22 AM
  #8  
shawnkng's Avatar
shawnkng
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: leeds
Default

hi all can you post the year of production for the 22b kind regards
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:23 AM
  #9  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 7
From: Shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by shawnkng
hi all can you post the year of production for the 22b kind regards

1998
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:23 AM
  #10  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

22b is a 98 car, have a look at Subaru Impreza Drivers Club under faq's

Tony
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:25 AM
  #11  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Smile

Originally Posted by staffi
The Spec C itself must be second Tony??
Pretty close though that extra 40ps probably gives the S204 the 3rd place with the spec c type RA very close with 2nd I would say.

Tony
Old 09 November 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #12  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 7
From: Shropshire
Default

Just a thought, surely some of the Classics like the Early RA`s etc would be quicker to 60 though with that mental gearing??
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #13  
scooby-tc's Avatar
scooby-tc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Default

The Spec C WR Ltd was 320ps out of the box on 2 different rolling roads my totally stan dard car made 319.2 at Powerstation and 307.9 at Surrey RR
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:38 AM
  #14  
djmisio85's Avatar
djmisio85
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Default

what about the s204??
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:40 AM
  #15  
tath's Avatar
tath
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
From: Llandudno
Default

An STI 3 Type RA would plop on a 22B methinks. 22B is a lot heavier, with the sameish power.
Old 09 November 2008 | 03:18 AM
  #16  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

S204 out the box makes 350bhp and so does the ra-r.
Old 09 November 2008 | 04:55 AM
  #17  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

That S204 is heavy though Juggers Great seats mind ...

TX.
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:06 PM
  #18  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Smile

Originally Posted by juggers
S204 out the box makes 350bhp and so does the ra-r.
Neither makes 350bhp, they are factory quoted at 320ps anything above that is "additional"

As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.

Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it

Tony
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #19  
dave247's Avatar
dave247
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Neither makes 350bhp, they are factory quoted at 320ps anything above that is "additional"

As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.

Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it

Tony
What about the RB320?
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #20  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Smile

Originally Posted by dave247
What about the RB320?
Not a factory production car

Tony
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #21  
scooby-tc's Avatar
scooby-tc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Neither makes 350bhp, they are factory quoted at 320ps anything above that is "additional"

As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.

Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it

Tony
Beg to differ Tony as every Spec C was 320ps,not a single one has ever made 276ps standard they have all been 300+ i think you been misquoted.The STi may have been quoted as 276ps but not the Spec C

edited for accuracy. They may have been quoted 276ps to get through that Jap ruling rubbish but they were all well above that

Last edited by scooby-tc; 09 November 2008 at 02:18 PM.
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #22  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 7
From: Shropshire
Default

Scooby-tc,

I was also under the impression Spec C`s where 300bhp or even a tad more, well that,s what Iain Litchfield told me anyway....

Mine certainly feels more than 280bhp strong, but i guess power delivery etc may make it feel sharper if you get me....
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #23  
scooby-tc's Avatar
scooby-tc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Default

well mine made 319 totally stock so it sure as hell isnt 280ps
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #24  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Originally Posted by scooby-tc
Beg to differ Tony as every Spec C was 320ps,not a single one has ever made 276ps standard they have all been 300+ i think you been misquoted.The STi may have been quoted as 276ps but not the Spec C

edited for accuracy. They may have been quoted 276ps to get through that Jap ruling rubbish but they were all well above that
Actually how many were tested with low miles on? not that many though mine was, made 288bhp at 1700 miles on the clock, pretty close to that factory figure though when run in a fair bit more, made a fair bit more, 316bhp on the jap map, not a uk remap for fuel

Oh and the japanese manual stated 280ps too for spec c's

Tony
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #25  
555wrxra's Avatar
555wrxra
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: OXFORDSHIRE
Default

Could we define what we mean buy fastest?
do we mean top speed?
0-60
0-100
1/8 mile
1/4 mile

Actually can you guys tell us what is the fastest to 60 & 100
and what has highest top speed!
i am intrigued i am looking to get a spec-c next year.
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:41 PM
  #26  
p12mem's Avatar
p12mem
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Default

no mention of the the p1, maybe it wasn't a factory built car?????
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #27  
scooby-tc's Avatar
scooby-tc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Default

The Type R and RA (1997>) was quicker than a P1 so thats knocked that out of the equation
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #28  
p12mem's Avatar
p12mem
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scooby-tc
The Type R and RA (1997>) was quicker than a P1 so thats knocked that out of the equation
was it, i'd like to see stats on that out of interest!
Old 09 November 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #29  
scooby-tc's Avatar
scooby-tc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Actually how many were tested with low miles on? not that many though mine was, made 288bhp at 1700 miles on the clock, pretty close to that factory figure though when run in a fair bit more, made a fair bit more, 316bhp on the jap map, not a uk remap for fuel

Oh and the japanese manual stated 280ps too for spec c's

Tony
That was my point Tony,if the same stock car makes 316 on jap map after 'it's loosened up' then it could never have been 280ps to begin with.
As you say yours made 288 with low miles,thats equates to over 290ps to start with hence the only way to get these cars through that weird jap rulng was to 'quote' 280ps which is isnt
Old 09 November 2008 | 03:18 PM
  #30  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Smile

Originally Posted by 555wrxra
Could we define what we mean buy fastest?
do we mean top speed?
0-60
0-100
1/8 mile
1/4 mile

Actually can you guys tell us what is the fastest to 60 & 100
and what has highest top speed!
i am intrigued i am looking to get a spec-c next year.
The spec c type ra-r is the quickest there, but the spec c is also very quick here, but dont buy one just because its fast, there are alot of compromises when you buy a spec c, ride quality, smaller fuel tank, more tiring etc.

Tony



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 AM.