fast production subaru
#1
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: leeds
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fast production subaru
hi all whats the fastest production subaru from standard car out of factory from classics 93 to todays models 08 just wanted to see that you guy think all the best
Trending Topics
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Neither makes 350bhp, they are factory quoted at 320ps anything above that is "additional"
As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.
Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it
Tony
As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.
Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it
Tony
#19
Neither makes 350bhp, they are factory quoted at 320ps anything above that is "additional"
As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.
Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it
Tony
As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.
Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it
Tony
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Here and there
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Neither makes 350bhp, they are factory quoted at 320ps anything above that is "additional"
As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.
Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it
Tony
As for the WR Ltd, 280ps out of the box not 320ps, only a few had 320ps, those being the S202, S203, S204 and RA-R.
Staffi, believe it or not, the older classic (sti) RA's are not as quick as the newer Spec C's which are more aerodynamic and with more powerful engines, and even though they weigh more, the gearing and torque more than makes up for it
Tony
edited for accuracy. They may have been quoted 276ps to get through that Jap ruling rubbish but they were all well above that
Last edited by scooby-tc; 09 November 2008 at 01:18 PM.
#22
Scooby Regular
Scooby-tc,
I was also under the impression Spec C`s where 300bhp or even a tad more, well that,s what Iain Litchfield told me anyway....
Mine certainly feels more than 280bhp strong, but i guess power delivery etc may make it feel sharper if you get me....
I was also under the impression Spec C`s where 300bhp or even a tad more, well that,s what Iain Litchfield told me anyway....
Mine certainly feels more than 280bhp strong, but i guess power delivery etc may make it feel sharper if you get me....
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Beg to differ Tony as every Spec C was 320ps,not a single one has ever made 276ps standard they have all been 300+ i think you been misquoted.The STi may have been quoted as 276ps but not the Spec C
edited for accuracy. They may have been quoted 276ps to get through that Jap ruling rubbish but they were all well above that
edited for accuracy. They may have been quoted 276ps to get through that Jap ruling rubbish but they were all well above that
Oh and the japanese manual stated 280ps too for spec c's
Tony
#25
Scooby Regular
Could we define what we mean buy fastest?
do we mean top speed?
0-60
0-100
1/8 mile
1/4 mile
Actually can you guys tell us what is the fastest to 60 & 100
and what has highest top speed!
i am intrigued i am looking to get a spec-c next year.
do we mean top speed?
0-60
0-100
1/8 mile
1/4 mile
Actually can you guys tell us what is the fastest to 60 & 100
and what has highest top speed!
i am intrigued i am looking to get a spec-c next year.
#28
#29
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Here and there
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually how many were tested with low miles on? not that many though mine was, made 288bhp at 1700 miles on the clock, pretty close to that factory figure though when run in a fair bit more, made a fair bit more, 316bhp on the jap map, not a uk remap for fuel
Oh and the japanese manual stated 280ps too for spec c's
Tony
Oh and the japanese manual stated 280ps too for spec c's
Tony
As you say yours made 288 with low miles,thats equates to over 290ps to start with hence the only way to get these cars through that weird jap rulng was to 'quote' 280ps which is isnt
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Tony