2.5 EJ25 bottom end Knocking on classic Impreza
#1
2.5 EJ25 bottom end Knocking on classic Impreza
Hi there,
I have a 97 P WRX Import Impreza.
The engine was built approx 1000 miles ago, took the car out today, this was the first time the engine had been opened up/revved harder than normal driving since the build. Got back to the house, had a cup of tea, checked the oil and water and fired it up to go round to a mates house, when pulling out the drive revving to about 2.5k in first when I changed gear I thought I heard a slight noise, stopped the car and didn't hear anything when on idle, drove for about 1 minute and the car was knocking (almost like a marble sound) when on idle and when bein revved. Phoned a mate who has owned and blown a good few Subarus and he confirmed it was bottom end failure.
The last engine which was pretty much standard went in the same manner.
It now has the following spec:
EJ257 short motor from Roger Clark Motorsport
STI crank and rods
Omega pistons
New sump
New water pump rcm
New rcm oil pump
1.6mm 3 layer cometic metal head gaskets
11mm ARP head bolts
All new idler pulleys
Import sti timing belt
SS set of headers (manifold and up pipe)
3" kakimoto from turbo back
440 sti injectors
V3 STI heads
Excedy organic clutch
Ngk pfr7b uprated plugs
Baileys dumpvalve
Standard ECU, Intercooler and Turbo
After spending all this money on the car I am a little P'd off as to it going again. Is there any reason anyone can think as to why it has done another bottom end?
It is run on correct oil, warmed up, cooled down etc etc.....
Thanks, Stephen
I have a 97 P WRX Import Impreza.
The engine was built approx 1000 miles ago, took the car out today, this was the first time the engine had been opened up/revved harder than normal driving since the build. Got back to the house, had a cup of tea, checked the oil and water and fired it up to go round to a mates house, when pulling out the drive revving to about 2.5k in first when I changed gear I thought I heard a slight noise, stopped the car and didn't hear anything when on idle, drove for about 1 minute and the car was knocking (almost like a marble sound) when on idle and when bein revved. Phoned a mate who has owned and blown a good few Subarus and he confirmed it was bottom end failure.
The last engine which was pretty much standard went in the same manner.
It now has the following spec:
EJ257 short motor from Roger Clark Motorsport
STI crank and rods
Omega pistons
New sump
New water pump rcm
New rcm oil pump
1.6mm 3 layer cometic metal head gaskets
11mm ARP head bolts
All new idler pulleys
Import sti timing belt
SS set of headers (manifold and up pipe)
3" kakimoto from turbo back
440 sti injectors
V3 STI heads
Excedy organic clutch
Ngk pfr7b uprated plugs
Baileys dumpvalve
Standard ECU, Intercooler and Turbo
After spending all this money on the car I am a little P'd off as to it going again. Is there any reason anyone can think as to why it has done another bottom end?
It is run on correct oil, warmed up, cooled down etc etc.....
Thanks, Stephen
#7
No car had not been mapped, was told to do 1000 miles before having the car setup. Bottom end was supplied fully built. Car is running standard ECU, VF22 turbo and std intercooler.
Just got the car back from the painters yesterday with new slitter, clear indicators and full front end respray.
Not sure what do do now and not sure how much come back I will have with RCM. Will have to phone and see.
Just got the car back from the painters yesterday with new slitter, clear indicators and full front end respray.
Not sure what do do now and not sure how much come back I will have with RCM. Will have to phone and see.
Trending Topics
#8
the enigine was supplied new i take it? if so did they fit it or did you do it yourself or local garage etc as i have been looking at doing a 2.5 conversion on my p1. i was told by three different companies all regarded for being at the top of thier game and all said that once the new lump was in that it would need a base map on it straight away as it would be all wrong so i would supsect that was your problem also i was told 1500-1800 mile run in on the new base map for the 2.5, just my opinion mate and i would get in contact with a few of the tuning companies such as engine tuner, api, roger clark and subaru 4 to see where you stand. sorry to hear your bad news mate and hope you get it sorted
#9
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (61)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N.I
Posts: 3,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No car had not been mapped, was told to do 1000 miles before having the car setup. Bottom end was supplied fully built. Car is running standard ECU, VF22 turbo and std intercooler.
Just got the car back from the painters yesterday with new slitter, clear indicators and full front end respray.
Not sure what do do now and not sure how much come back I will have with RCM. Will have to phone and see.
Just got the car back from the painters yesterday with new slitter, clear indicators and full front end respray.
Not sure what do do now and not sure how much come back I will have with RCM. Will have to phone and see.
you were badly advised. A 2.5 running a 2.0 map would have massive detonation causing the failure you describe. The ignition timing on a 2.0 map is way different to that for 2.5
#10
the enigine was supplied new i take it? if so did they fit it or did you do it yourself or local garage etc as i have been looking at doing a 2.5 conversion on my p1. i was told by three different companies all regarded for being at the top of thier game and all said that once the new lump was in that it would need a base map on it straight away as it would be all wrong so i would supsect that was your problem also i was told 1500-1800 mile run in on the new base map for the 2.5, just my opinion mate and i would get in contact with a few of the tuning companies such as engine tuner, api, roger clark and subaru 4 to see where you stand. sorry to hear your bad news mate and hope you get it sorted
Thanks
#11
Nightmare!! Don't know what to do here, I was told it would be safe on standard map. I am going to phone and see what they say.
#13
I cant see RCM giving that kind of advise about running it on a standard 2ltr map are you sure they didnt say run it on a base map , you shouldnt really boost the car without a full map, infact your actuator should of been diconnected while you run it in to stop boost & ECU limited to about 4000rpm to stop you over reving it, Really hope you get something sorted mate, Good luck
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actuator should NOT be disconnected while running in and revs should NOT be limited electronically or otherwise to 4000 rpms.
An important part of the running in procedure is to give the engine some boost and varied revs (including some high rev work) to prevent glazing the bores.
I'll agree with you that you shouldn't run around revving the **** off it at 2bar plus, but all the same the above is not great advise.
An important part of the running in procedure is to give the engine some boost and varied revs (including some high rev work) to prevent glazing the bores.
I'll agree with you that you shouldn't run around revving the **** off it at 2bar plus, but all the same the above is not great advise.
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
You say the bottom end was supplied fully built, was this with the sump fitted, & what about the history of the top end.
What i am getting at is who fitted the heads etc & more importantly there state of cleaning.
It will be the get out clause of any engine builder when the rest of the build is out of there hands.
Also you say it was at the painters, how do you know they have'nt flogged the guts out of it when its cold.
Best of luck with this problem.
What i am getting at is who fitted the heads etc & more importantly there state of cleaning.
It will be the get out clause of any engine builder when the rest of the build is out of there hands.
Also you say it was at the painters, how do you know they have'nt flogged the guts out of it when its cold.
Best of luck with this problem.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i know of people who have ran in 2.5 conversions on the 2.0 map, but i would never advise it!
they are 25% larger engines, they require 25% extra fuel!!
they are 25% larger engines, they require 25% extra fuel!!
#17
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Several things come to mind here. It would be so far off the original map that it is almost crimninal to run it at all on a 2.0 map. 2.5's tend to overheat their oil, so a proper oil cooler is an essential parts of the conversion.
Sounds like you've given it some beans to see ' how it feels ' and on the wrong map you had no chance of it surviving.
The original fit Subaru bearings on a new motor are as good as it gets for fit. Agreed they are not tri-metal, BUT they are selectively sized to the crank and no-one outside of Subaru production line has access to selective sized bearings. We would use the originals as I am fairly certain RCM do for the same reason.
If we had supplied the motor and it had failed under the circumatsnces you advise we would not accept any responsibility for the damage as it was beyond our control.
However, we would never have allowed you to run it on the 2.0 map.
Tough luck mate, seems self inflicted from what is said above.
David APi
Agents for:
Simtek, the most exciting new Ecu for years
Buddy Club exhausts
Eibach suspension
Hybrid front mount intercooler kits
AP Racing brakes and clutches
And of course; the well known APi Performance Exedy organic clutch
Welcome to the API website
01926 614333
Sounds like you've given it some beans to see ' how it feels ' and on the wrong map you had no chance of it surviving.
The original fit Subaru bearings on a new motor are as good as it gets for fit. Agreed they are not tri-metal, BUT they are selectively sized to the crank and no-one outside of Subaru production line has access to selective sized bearings. We would use the originals as I am fairly certain RCM do for the same reason.
If we had supplied the motor and it had failed under the circumatsnces you advise we would not accept any responsibility for the damage as it was beyond our control.
However, we would never have allowed you to run it on the 2.0 map.
Tough luck mate, seems self inflicted from what is said above.
David APi
Agents for:
Simtek, the most exciting new Ecu for years
Buddy Club exhausts
Eibach suspension
Hybrid front mount intercooler kits
AP Racing brakes and clutches
And of course; the well known APi Performance Exedy organic clutch
Welcome to the API website
01926 614333
#18
You say the bottom end was supplied fully built, was this with the sump fitted, & what about the history of the top end.
What i am getting at is who fitted the heads etc & more importantly there state of cleaning.
It will be the get out clause of any engine builder when the rest of the build is out of there hands.
Also you say it was at the painters, how do you know they have'nt flogged the guts out of it when its cold.
Best of luck with this problem.
What i am getting at is who fitted the heads etc & more importantly there state of cleaning.
It will be the get out clause of any engine builder when the rest of the build is out of there hands.
Also you say it was at the painters, how do you know they have'nt flogged the guts out of it when its cold.
Best of luck with this problem.
Car had not moved whilst at the painters, trust me I would not leave my car anywhere it would be abused / tampered with.
Thanks
#19
Several things come to mind here. It would be so far off the original map that it is almost crimninal to run it at all on a 2.0 map. 2.5's tend to overheat their oil, so a proper oil cooler is an essential parts of the conversion.
Sounds like you've given it some beans to see ' how it feels ' and on the wrong map you had no chance of it surviving.
The original fit Subaru bearings on a new motor are as good as it gets for fit. Agreed they are not tri-metal, BUT they are selectively sized to the crank and no-one outside of Subaru production line has access to selective sized bearings. We would use the originals as I am fairly certain RCM do for the same reason.
If we had supplied the motor and it had failed under the circumatsnces you advise we would not accept any responsibility for the damage as it was beyond our control.
However, we would never have allowed you to run it on the 2.0 map.
Tough luck mate, seems self inflicted from what is said above.
David APi
Agents for:
Simtek, the most exciting new Ecu for years
Buddy Club exhausts
Eibach suspension
Hybrid front mount intercooler kits
AP Racing brakes and clutches
And of course; the well known APi Performance Exedy organic clutch
Welcome to the API website
01926 614333
Sounds like you've given it some beans to see ' how it feels ' and on the wrong map you had no chance of it surviving.
The original fit Subaru bearings on a new motor are as good as it gets for fit. Agreed they are not tri-metal, BUT they are selectively sized to the crank and no-one outside of Subaru production line has access to selective sized bearings. We would use the originals as I am fairly certain RCM do for the same reason.
If we had supplied the motor and it had failed under the circumatsnces you advise we would not accept any responsibility for the damage as it was beyond our control.
However, we would never have allowed you to run it on the 2.0 map.
Tough luck mate, seems self inflicted from what is said above.
David APi
Agents for:
Simtek, the most exciting new Ecu for years
Buddy Club exhausts
Eibach suspension
Hybrid front mount intercooler kits
AP Racing brakes and clutches
And of course; the well known APi Performance Exedy organic clutch
Welcome to the API website
01926 614333
Basically going by what you guys are saying about mapping etc. I would say the blame is on RCM for advising me incorrectly about setup. I know I will get knowhere with them and I will have to repair off out of my own pocket.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
seen plenty of painters take a car for a spin, hell even MY scooby was taken out when it was booked in for a paintjob around 5 years back, the gaffer let it slip that it was nippy
#22
in my opinion if you were advised by rcm that it could be driven on the original map then they are at fault but are you 100% sure on that and that they did not mean a base map for the 2.5ltr as i have already said i have spoke with API, subaru 4 you, engine tuner and bob rawle and they all stated that a base map would NEED to be put on as if not it would end in te same result you have had.
if they did advise you it would be ok then unless you have it in writting on email or recorded phone call i doubt you will have any luck proving it so i think you will have to take it as a lesson learnt and i am quite shocked that they woul dhave told you that as i have heard nothing but good things about them in the past.
i feel for you though and hope you have some luck with them atleast supplying you new parts.
if they did advise you it would be ok then unless you have it in writting on email or recorded phone call i doubt you will have any luck proving it so i think you will have to take it as a lesson learnt and i am quite shocked that they woul dhave told you that as i have heard nothing but good things about them in the past.
i feel for you though and hope you have some luck with them atleast supplying you new parts.
#23
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: n/a
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they may have advised run in period would be ok on 2.0 map.. but correct me if im wrong.. when running in, you drive off boost? so maybe they wasnt expecting some on boost driving by yourself.
not sure, but i'd feel so guttted if it was me in your position, really feel for you.
hope it gets sorted
not sure, but i'd feel so guttted if it was me in your position, really feel for you.
hope it gets sorted
#25
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I am absolutely convinced that RCM would NEVER advise that the above specification would work at all on a standard map. I know them well and their attention to detail is better than many. It is so far off the specification of the original WRX map that any tuner worth his salt would not even let you fit the STi heads and cams without a map on a 2.0 let alone a 2.5.
Without mapping straight off from day one, that engine was doomed.
David APi
Without mapping straight off from day one, that engine was doomed.
David APi
#26
Also known as daz
Have to agree, fitting a 2.5 without a remap is suicide, you at least needed a base map just to get things going, ideally mapped at intervals during the run in process when the engine can better handle higher boost levels.
Like david says you're going have to chalk it up to experience, rcms are highly regarded id be very surprised they would advise you to run in with the 2.0 ecu they probably assumed you had the sense to fit a 2.5 ecu along with the lump, they have better knock control so at least would have gone into limp mode if something bad was going on.
Best of luck in getting it all sorted though, don't crank the engine any more and hope the crank is fine to be reused.
Like david says you're going have to chalk it up to experience, rcms are highly regarded id be very surprised they would advise you to run in with the 2.0 ecu they probably assumed you had the sense to fit a 2.5 ecu along with the lump, they have better knock control so at least would have gone into limp mode if something bad was going on.
Best of luck in getting it all sorted though, don't crank the engine any more and hope the crank is fine to be reused.
#27
Someone explain this quote?
how can ignition timing be way different? ignition timing is taken from the crank sensor so it knows where the engine is on its cycle etc. you use the same pulleys timing belt heads cams etc from a 2.0l.
also whats the point in running all this sensors on an engine if you still have to map the ecu. surely all the sensor can give live input to the ecu which can in turn change the out put to suit fueling revs etc.
#28
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Someone explain this quote?
how can ignition timing be way different? ignition timing is taken from the crank sensor so it knows where the engine is on its cycle etc. you use the same pulleys timing belt heads cams etc from a 2.0l.
also whats the point in running all this sensors on an engine if you still have to map the ecu. surely all the sensor can give live input to the ecu which can in turn change the out put to suit fueling revs etc.
how can ignition timing be way different? ignition timing is taken from the crank sensor so it knows where the engine is on its cycle etc. you use the same pulleys timing belt heads cams etc from a 2.0l.
also whats the point in running all this sensors on an engine if you still have to map the ecu. surely all the sensor can give live input to the ecu which can in turn change the out put to suit fueling revs etc.
#29
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also whats the point in running all this sensors on an engine if you still have to map the ecu. surely all the sensor can give live input to the ecu which can in turn change the out put to suit fueling revs etc.
#30
pray tell me how motorbikes can manage to do all this and have done for the last god knows how long. they dnt require mapping everytime you go to the toilet. just can't see why subarus have to be so fussy. but you say putting the foot down well then it takes a reading from the map sensor noticing the difference in intake pressure adjust fuel accordingly. not rocket science. even an induction kit people reckon you need a re map or de cat. how come no other vehicle blows up when doing this but a scooby will if you dnt map it.
learnt my lesson with an impreza and would never buy another one if i was given it for free. sorry scooby lovers
learnt my lesson with an impreza and would never buy another one if i was given it for free. sorry scooby lovers