Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

2.5 Litre Sti engine question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23 February 2011, 06:43 PM
  #1  
LoftyMan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LoftyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 2.5 Litre Sti engine question

I have been trying to weigh up which type of Wrx Sti would be right for me. A late Blob-eye or a 06 Hawk-eye (Lower tax bracket).

My reason for this post though is that I have heard that the 2.5 litre in the Hawk-eye has lost the trade-mark Subaru 'burble'.

I am not all for performance, just a clean model to look after, aslong as it has that loud 'burble'. Would a Hawk-eye be a lost cause or can you still get that fantastic 'burble' from the 2.5 litre?

Thanks
Old 23 February 2011, 06:50 PM
  #2  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LoftyMan
I have been trying to weigh up which type of Wrx Sti would be right for me. A late Blob-eye or a 06 Hawk-eye (Lower tax bracket).

My reason for this post though is that I have heard that the 2.5 litre in the Hawk-eye has lost the trade-mark Subaru 'burble'.

I am not all for performance, just a clean model to look after, aslong as it has that loud 'burble'. Would a Hawk-eye be a lost cause or can you still get that fantastic 'burble' from the 2.5 litre?

Thanks
It's nothing to do with engine size per se mate; it's whether the car is fitted with equal or unequal length headers. All UK STi Imprezas, 2.0 litre or 2.5 litre, have unequal length which generates the lovey burble!

The 2.5's, just got fitted with a very quiet exhaust systems as std that mask the sound. Better centre section and backbox = Burble is back. :-)

Japanese domestic market models use the 2.0 litre engine, but also use equal length manifolds, which do rob the car of the burble, no matter what kind of exhaust back box and centre section you put on them!

Last edited by New_scooby_04; 23 February 2011 at 06:52 PM.
Old 23 February 2011, 06:52 PM
  #3  
LoftyMan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LoftyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, but if I get a UK Hawk-eye with a PPP fitted, will I be hearing the same trademark burble or does it need an entirely new backbox etc?
Old 23 February 2011, 06:53 PM
  #4  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LoftyMan
Ok, but if I get a UK Hawk-eye with a PPP fitted, will I be hearing the same trademark burble or does it need an entirely new backbox etc?
It's there, but it's quite quiet with the PPP backbox.
Old 23 February 2011, 07:02 PM
  #5  
LoftyMan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LoftyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So put a Miltek on there and were back?
Old 23 February 2011, 07:06 PM
  #6  
bushiwarrior
Scooby Regular
 
bushiwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LoftyMan
So put a Miltek on there and were back?
Bingo ,correct
Old 23 February 2011, 07:24 PM
  #7  
SpecDscooby
Scooby Regular
 
SpecDscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 07 Spec D, in progress
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have H&S personally on my 2.5, and burble's like a ****......bare in mind you have a tough search for that 2.5 in cheap tax bracket....needs to have been registered prior to 23rd (or 26th, cant remember) march 2006.....so an early 06' plate indeed.....good luck!
Old 23 February 2011, 07:32 PM
  #8  
LoftyMan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LoftyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpecDscooby
I have H&S personally on my 2.5, and burble's like a ****......bare in mind you have a tough search for that 2.5 in cheap tax bracket....needs to have been registered prior to 23rd (or 26th, cant remember) march 2006.....so an early 06' plate indeed.....good luck!

Great news, im currently looking at a 06 Hawk-eye but I think it was first registered in July. Is that right? If its registered in July wouldn't it be a 56 plate?
Old 23 February 2011, 07:40 PM
  #9  
Billet
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (60)
 
Billet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Mids
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

56 starts in september.
Old 23 February 2011, 07:55 PM
  #10  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Without wishing to sound like a snob, and I know the government are a bunch of thieves which grates !....but... if you can't afford £16 a month extra for a newer impreza your gonna be broke owning a subaru Buy the best scoob you can afford and worry about the ownership costs rather than the small change tax increases
Old 23 February 2011, 07:56 PM
  #11  
LoftyMan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LoftyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought the difference was 55 blob-eye at £230 tax vs 06 Hawk-eye at £420 odd. Thats a fair bit more than 16 quid. Am I wrong?
Old 23 February 2011, 07:58 PM
  #12  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

...a month not really a great deal in the scheme of things for the right car IMHO
Old 23 February 2011, 08:07 PM
  #13  
NEILLLLL
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
NEILLLLL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you get a 55 plate hawk you'll be ok as thats what i have . Mine was registered jan 06 and its in the cheaper tax bracket . But what is £400 Once a year
Old 23 February 2011, 08:19 PM
  #14  
LoftyMan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LoftyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Excuss my ignorance but I thought after 23rd March tax on the scoobys went up to over 400 quid a year?
Old 23 February 2011, 08:25 PM
  #15  
awdx4
Scooby Regular
 
awdx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine was first registered just prior to 23rd march 06 and costs me £245 per year, It's a Hawkeye.

Tim
Old 23 February 2011, 08:31 PM
  #16  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yup, not really a deal breaker though
Old 23 February 2011, 08:35 PM
  #17  
SpecDscooby
Scooby Regular
 
SpecDscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 07 Spec D, in progress
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Correct

If registered prior to 23rd march 2006 it will be £245, if after that date it is £435.....sounds a lot ah......then reconsider your choice in car, it a one off payment, something that is few and far between with an Impreza....53WRX is right, i was sniffing around for an early 06, like you are now for the cheaper tax....i bought a clean solid 2007 Sti....and i will enjoy the re sale just the same, its a matter of time before the governement alter the rules i'm sure!
Old 23 February 2011, 08:42 PM
  #18  
awdx4
Scooby Regular
 
awdx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tbh the low tax was a bonus and not a deciding factor as I probably spend almost the difference in tax cost each month on goodies for the car so in scheme of things it's not a factor which has any bearing on a purchase for myself as they'll get me next time round for sure when I replace the car.
Old 23 February 2011, 08:57 PM
  #19  
tim's wrx
Scooby Regular
 
tim's wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This one??

http://www.themotorhouse.co.uk/car_d...aspx?vid=37422
Old 23 February 2011, 09:10 PM
  #20  
LoftyMan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LoftyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Silvers not my thing, but thanks for the link. I am really apreciative of all the help, so apart from the tax, what would swing me to go for a hawk-eye over a blob-eye? Stupid question? But some of you must have a good reason aprt from the difference in looks.

Will the .5litre be worth it etc?
Old 23 February 2011, 10:07 PM
  #21  
pulse
Scooby Regular
 
pulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

m8t iv just purchased a hawk 56 plate 07 year with ppp mine has a lurrvley burble.
Old 23 February 2011, 10:15 PM
  #22  
EH52WRX
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
EH52WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: In Paradise
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LoftyMan
Silvers not my thing, but thanks for the link. I am really apreciative of all the help, so apart from the tax, what would swing me to go for a hawk-eye over a blob-eye? Stupid question? But some of you must have a good reason aprt from the difference in looks.

Will the .5litre be worth it etc?
OMG i don't think Subaru ownership is for you fella.

By the sounds of it, i think a Volvo might be better.
Old 23 February 2011, 10:26 PM
  #23  
LoftyMan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LoftyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EH52WRX
OMG i don't think Subaru ownership is for you fella.

By the sounds of it, i think a Volvo might be better.

Lol, I know the Hawk-eye engine has more torque throughout the range ect but people seem to feel that the 2 litre in the blob-eyes was/is overall a better engine.
Old 23 February 2011, 10:47 PM
  #24  
IggyRB320
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
IggyRB320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In standard form MY 05 STi Type UK had a cracking flat four burble.

MY07 RB320 was quiet in comparison, until I fitted the Blitz Nur Spec R!

On the 2.5ltr, you’ll definitely need to get rid of at least the centre resonated section & a decent back box will make it sound all the better.
Old 23 February 2011, 11:12 PM
  #25  
SRSport
Scooby Regular
 
SRSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3,360
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LoftyMan
Lol, I know the Hawk-eye engine has more torque throughout the range ect but people seem to feel that the 2 litre in the blob-eyes was/is overall a better engine.
That seems to be very subjective. The 2.5 is smoother and offers more grunt throughout the rev range where as the 2.0 gave you the lag...woosh, in a fast and furious kind of way, i.e. on or off. I would personally prefer the 2.5 style but I can easily see the 2.0 attraction.
Old 24 February 2011, 08:16 AM
  #26  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Hello it's your storker lol,
Depends how you like your power delivered, 2.0l kick in the ***,2.5l wave of power both end in the same result= smiles, but im more a kick in the *** type of a guy Iv'e had both in a 04wrx tuned to sti power with supporting mods,both were good i just prefered the urgency of the 2.l.
On a side note there have been a few headgasket failures on the 2.5l not sure which model / yr but its in the age of cars your looking at.
The only way to find out is book a couple of test drives and see for yourself.
Old 24 February 2011, 09:02 AM
  #27  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EH52WRX
OMG i don't think Subaru ownership is for you fella.

By the sounds of it, i think a Volvo might be better.

Hahahahaha,,, you could be right fella.
If your worrying about the extra couple of hundred quid a year for tax then maybe a Impreza isn't right for you.
If it has to be scoob, why not start off with a cheaper model and see how you go. These cars are not cheap to run and jumping in at the deep end may well be a mistake.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nick71
General Technical
21
20 September 2015 03:52 PM



Quick Reply: 2.5 Litre Sti engine question



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 AM.