Standard WRX whp figure?
Trending Topics
#8
you're assuming his car is 226 standard. i took his actual whp and added 22%. your calculations of 188whp equates to a 27% loss if you hp is 238. depends on the dyno i suppose.
taking 176 and adding 28% losses get 226 approximately. is my logic or maths faulty somewhere?
#9
Maths is faulty im afraid
for arguements sake say its 200bhp, and loss is 20%, so 20% of 200 is 40hp, so whp would be 160, with me so far?
Now you cant work it in reverse.
160whp + 20% doesnt equal 200 bhp, but only 192 bhp, why? cause 20% of 160 is only 32
losses only occur in one direction, when working backwards things gain
The actual gain from whp to bhp in this imaginary case is 25%
so going into this real case, if it was a 226 bhp engine he would have a transmission loss of 22.2% giving 175.9, or if transmission loss is 22% exactly the bhp will be 225.5
for arguements sake say its 200bhp, and loss is 20%, so 20% of 200 is 40hp, so whp would be 160, with me so far?
Now you cant work it in reverse.
160whp + 20% doesnt equal 200 bhp, but only 192 bhp, why? cause 20% of 160 is only 32
losses only occur in one direction, when working backwards things gain
The actual gain from whp to bhp in this imaginary case is 25%
so going into this real case, if it was a 226 bhp engine he would have a transmission loss of 22.2% giving 175.9, or if transmission loss is 22% exactly the bhp will be 225.5
#11
ok easiest way to get bhp from whp is divide whp by 0.78
0.78 is the percentage left after losses expressed as a decimal amount (100%-22%=78%) assuming losses is 22%
So 175.9/0.78=225.51282bhp
Hope that helps!!
John
0.78 is the percentage left after losses expressed as a decimal amount (100%-22%=78%) assuming losses is 22%
So 175.9/0.78=225.51282bhp
Hope that helps!!
John
#13
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Its not that hard normally and if you do a rolling road run then it will give you (normally) an engine and wheel figure for bhp.
For instance, my old car ran between 312 and 316bhp, put down between 260 and 265 on the road.
So if you have the 2 figures to start with, 316 and 265, you divide the lower against the higher, ends up for these as .8386, which is just over 16% losses
Tony
For instance, my old car ran between 312 and 316bhp, put down between 260 and 265 on the road.
So if you have the 2 figures to start with, 316 and 265, you divide the lower against the higher, ends up for these as .8386, which is just over 16% losses
Tony
#16
Maths is faulty im afraid
for arguements sake say its 200bhp, and loss is 20%, so 20% of 200 is 40hp, so whp would be 160, with me so far?
Now you cant work it in reverse.
160whp + 20% doesnt equal 200 bhp, but only 192 bhp, why? cause 20% of 160 is only 32
losses only occur in one direction, when working backwards things gain
The actual gain from whp to bhp in this imaginary case is 25%
so going into this real case, if it was a 226 bhp engine he would have a transmission loss of 22.2% giving 175.9, or if transmission loss is 22% exactly the bhp will be 225.5
for arguements sake say its 200bhp, and loss is 20%, so 20% of 200 is 40hp, so whp would be 160, with me so far?
Now you cant work it in reverse.
160whp + 20% doesnt equal 200 bhp, but only 192 bhp, why? cause 20% of 160 is only 32
losses only occur in one direction, when working backwards things gain
The actual gain from whp to bhp in this imaginary case is 25%
so going into this real case, if it was a 226 bhp engine he would have a transmission loss of 22.2% giving 175.9, or if transmission loss is 22% exactly the bhp will be 225.5
#19
Had mine done as a completely standard car. Nothing touched!! Its a 51 bugeye wrx. Running on shell v power
231.5 bhp
177.0 whp
I also have print out to prove. Hope this helps
Wonkey
231.5 bhp
177.0 whp
I also have print out to prove. Hope this helps
Wonkey
Last edited by Wonkey85; 17 February 2012 at 12:10 AM. Reason: Missing info
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 04:08 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 09:16 AM
matt12
ScoobyNet General
64
16 September 2015 10:16 PM
matt12
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
4
14 September 2015 10:36 AM