Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Sorry.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22 August 2012 | 02:03 AM
  #1  
kapri's Avatar
kapri
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default Sorry.

I only ever turn up with bad news please take the time to check out the latest EU plans to ban modifying and it looks like retrospectively as well.

http://www.the-ace.org.uk/armageddon/
Old 22 August 2012 | 02:18 AM
  #2  
wiley's Avatar
wiley
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,865
Likes: 3
From: dagenham a13
Default

surely not, the amount of business it will close or end. this will never happen

wiley
Old 22 August 2012 | 02:26 AM
  #3  
siannie's Avatar
siannie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: in a JDM V7 STi...
Default

Originally Posted by wiley
surely not, the amount of business it will close or end. this will never happen

wiley
Same thought, plus every 17 yr old who puts in some lexus lights in his/her saxo is going to be affected also - Halfrauds would go out of business!

I presume then it would get checked at MOT? and coppers would pull over anything that wasn't standard on exterior. I for one, would be pulled for my exhaust alone!

Surely a black market would appear too?

Just seems unimaginable! get away from this EU sh*te asap!!
Old 22 August 2012 | 02:39 AM
  #4  
Stevesbluewrx's Avatar
Stevesbluewrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Also known as The Gimp
Default

Great, lets listen to frenchman without brains!!

So in effect, this could mean the end of the WRC, IRC etc. How they going to drive these "Modified" cars on the road sections before stages?

Next there be opening the floodgates to anyone from within the EU flock to a contry of there choice!! .........Oh hang on???

Steve
Old 22 August 2012 | 08:21 AM
  #5  
scooby546's Avatar
scooby546
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

It won't happen - quite simply because it is too difficult to police. For example, where are the standards defined as to what is standard on any particular car? Component specifications change throughout the manufacturing history of models, so one car of the exact same type as another could be made to different standards depending on the date it was released. How far does it go, would they consider a change of tyres to be a modification? Change of stereo? Paint colour? As said above it would kill a huge industry base as well, both for aftermarket parts and indeed smaller garages - would they consider servicing by a non-approved garage to be a modification as well? It's just too generic to be enforceable and would most certainly cause more problems than it claims to be trying to solve

There is a PDF link to the proposal itself in the link above; having read through it (yes, quiet at work so far )it contains various errors and assumptions which quite frankly discredit the whole thing. Not much to worry about here I don't think

Last edited by scooby546; 22 August 2012 at 08:25 AM. Reason: more info...
Old 22 August 2012 | 08:59 AM
  #6  
apac's Avatar
apac
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 1
From: Spec C Ltd 385/407
Default

There goes my plan to make the first scooby monster truck!
Old 22 August 2012 | 09:01 AM
  #7  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Vote UKIP
Old 22 August 2012 | 09:55 AM
  #8  
banzai2009's Avatar
banzai2009
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: sunderland
Default

THIS IS GREAT NEWS

Another excuse and reason for coppers to get money out of motorists instead of doing actual police work catching junkies/ dealers/ rapists/ peaodos etc..

Scooby546 I agree this won't happen but surely to remember the little black box thing that was going to be impossible ti do now look insurance companies are using them now. Not as big scale but still I wouldn't put it passed them


Total bull this government but agreed surely they can't pass this there twittering on about having no money then do this???? :/

So no halfords/ tuners/ mappers/ dyno shops/ paint shops/ body repair shops/ eBay pretty much down the swanny/piston heads/ car forums/ swapz etc etc

They really don't think about things do they it's ok for them they can afford to buy £100,000 masserati/Bentleys with 500bhp standard

It's as if there DELIBRITLY trying to finish this country

Last edited by banzai2009; 22 August 2012 at 09:58 AM.
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:14 AM
  #9  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

If this is as serious as it sounds shouldn't we, as in SN, be adding our voices properly to those against this latest bit of EU nonsense.

At least this should be retitled and made a sticky. We need to protest as much as we can, at the very least write to our MPs about this rather than just sitting back and expectng someone else to do it in true British style.

The 'it will never happen' brigade may be right, but surely the fact that the proposal contains errors and assumptions will not prevent it passing into law given the EU's performance on things like this in the past.

The UK givernment just for once need to grow a spine and say No to something and we need to tell them to do that!
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:15 AM
  #10  
ste_brough's Avatar
ste_brough
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

Is it just me or have they got the wrong end of the stick? To me the link document discusses introducing a test for vehicles at the time of first registration only? The rest of the document sounds like the outline of a normal MOT?
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:25 AM
  #11  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by ste_brough
Is it just me or have they got the wrong end of the stick? To me the link document discusses introducing a test for vehicles at the time of first registration only? The rest of the document sounds like the outline of a normal MOT?
Reading it now and I can see what you are saying.... will read it to the end and see what gives!
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:30 AM
  #12  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by L3YMS
I haven't fully read the documents because I simply can't be bothered.
However I wouldn't be surprised if the future of motoring in general attempts a move toward the outlawing of modifications.
The recent tightening of the mot test with regards to having to have all CATS present and I think now having to have an airbag if one was fitted originally all seem to me to be moves in this direction.
Yes, but is it being enforced at all right now? My car went through its MOT last month with no mention of a missing cat, no advisory... nothing!

What worries me is all this legislation slides into place and then all of a suudden the testers, plod etc. start to enforce it 100% to the letter of the law... going to be a lot of unhappy people around if that happens.

It's the sneaky way they introduce these things that gets me!

If this is what the ACE website think it is then we need to prevent it becoming law or at least try!
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
ste_brough's Avatar
ste_brough
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

You don't need to read it all, just read the bits they quote properly.
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #14  
scooby546's Avatar
scooby546
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by banzai2009
Scooby546 I agree this won't happen but surely to remember the little black box thing that was going to be impossible ti do now look insurance companies are using them now. Not as big scale but still I wouldn't put it passed them
Yes, I heard about this as well. While I can see the point for rental cars, and some of them are fitted with CCTV as well, perhaps even taxis and public transport vehicles etc, but NOT private cars. Private cars are just that, private, and shouldn't be monitored 24x7 by these devices. We have to remember that once they are installed, it is a very small step between monitoring for insurance purposes and giving out automated speeding / parking tickets. Not good.... I for sure will not be installing one of these devices, total invasion of privacy imho
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:42 AM
  #15  
ste_brough's Avatar
ste_brough
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

Those black boxes are purely optional ... ?
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:45 AM
  #16  
scooby546's Avatar
scooby546
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ste_brough
Those black boxes are purely optional ... ?
Thankfully yes, they are - at the moment anyway. My concern is once a few insurance companies start using them, they could be come more widespread, even fitted to new cars at manufacture etc.
Old 22 August 2012 | 10:48 AM
  #17  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

this has been doing the rounds for ages now, won't happen. Too much tax involved for the government.

Also as said un-enforcable
Old 22 August 2012 | 11:11 AM
  #18  
dirtybarry's Avatar
dirtybarry
BANNED
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: wilts
Default

would mean more police on the streets after all the cuts the force has had

never
Old 22 August 2012 | 02:08 PM
  #19  
banzai2009's Avatar
banzai2009
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: sunderland
Default

Nblack boxes are optional it's been brought in by insurance companies for such as young drivers to bring there premiums down ie they can't drive after 9:00pm or go over the speed limit etc etc..

It's just the start I think personally how many times have people been pulled over in modified cars just because they are just that modified ??

It strikes me as odd as to why there even bothering with this rubbish and not consentrating on say money/ immigrants / mortgages/ banks these are just a few far more important things rather than people putting an exhaust I there car and so forth
Old 22 August 2012 | 02:11 PM
  #20  
Moley's Avatar
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Likes: 30
Default

Several EU countries have had these rules for years now, so only a matter of time untill it happens over here unfortunately (now we're one big European family)
Old 22 August 2012 | 02:23 PM
  #21  
urban's Avatar
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,566
Likes: 1
From: Never you mind
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Yes, but is it being enforced at all right now? My car went through its MOT last month with no mention of a missing cat, no advisory... nothing!
You got away with it because you get to use 'Tommy's garage' for your MOT.
I would imagine that will eventually be replaced with a government place.

In N.Ireland, you have to go to a government controlled test centre, and not some garage down the road.
Old 22 August 2012 | 02:26 PM
  #22  
tubbytommy's Avatar
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 1
From: crawley :)
Default

Originally Posted by urban
You got away with it because you get to use 'Tommy's garage' for your MOT.
I would imagine that will eventually be replaced with a government place.

In N.Ireland, you have to go to a government controlled test centre, and not some garage down the road.
I do a good deal at my garage
Old 22 August 2012 | 03:07 PM
  #23  
SirFozzalot's Avatar
SirFozzalot
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 19,633
Likes: 1
From: Essex
Default

I haven't read the document but the OP mentions it would be retrospective. If a ban on all modifications came in to force how could they possibly make it retrospective? Surely they would have to make it from a date like "All new cars from Jan 2013" or such.

With the amount of money spent on modifying cars over the years; for a new rule that puts a blanket ban on all cars ever would basically "write-off" thousands of cars with the owners being thousands of pounds out of pocket and not able to afford a new car or put their modified car back to standard. Stuff like Mk1 escorts with cossie lumps spring to mind instantly but there are hundreds of different examples, just look at the projects section on here to see how much time, effort and money has gone in to modifying cars and what the owners would lose.

I'm not saying it could never happen for new cars but I would be very surprised if it effected all cars, ever. Like the new road tax bands that were released a while back. Originally it was going to effect all cars after 2001 but that never materialised and only effected cars after 2006 so I'm thinking something similar would have to be done.

I hope it doesn't go back to 2003!
Old 22 August 2012 | 04:06 PM
  #24  
urban's Avatar
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,566
Likes: 1
From: Never you mind
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
I do a good deal at my garage
I'm glad
Old 22 August 2012 | 09:47 PM
  #25  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,781
Likes: 27
From: Rl'yeh
Default

IF the EC bring it is, I wouldn't be surprised to see the UK one of the first, if not THE first to implement it.
Old 22 August 2012 | 09:55 PM
  #26  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 8
From: Leicester
Default

And if they do make it retrospective too, expect some many and serious lawsuits against the UK govt., from furious modded car owners!

It's outrageous they could do that!!!
Old 23 August 2012 | 02:46 PM
  #27  
speedking's Avatar
speedking
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
From: Warrington
Default

We had a decent three piece suite once that we wanted to replace. Government had introduced new fire regulations for furniture. We couldn't even give it away to a charity.

It may have been compliant with the new rules, but didn't have the correct labels. Hundreds of pounds lost
Old 24 August 2012 | 09:53 AM
  #28  
Carlh's Avatar
Carlh
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 0
From: Telford
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
Vote UKIP

amen.
Old 24 August 2012 | 02:51 PM
  #29  
wrx300scooby's Avatar
wrx300scooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 6
From: Prostate cancer got me, please get checked guys
Default

Originally Posted by kapri
I only ever turn up with bad news please take the time to check out the latest EU plans to ban modifying and it looks like retrospectively as well.

http://www.the-ace.org.uk/armageddon/
Iv'e known the OP for years. He is well into regs and the like, this is a serious issue guys.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elvis Presley
ScoobyNet General
10
22 February 2002 10:08 PM
Deep Singh
Drivetrain
2
25 February 2001 06:26 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:18 AM.