Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

PPP 0-60 Times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 April 2001 | 10:16 AM
  #1  
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 16,978
Likes: 15
From: From far, far away...
Talking

If I was to get PTMW! PPP'd (as if the wife would allow it ) anyone got any times for the 0-60 / 0-100 or even 1/4s?

Wondering how many seconds/10ths of one could expect to better over standard (5.8 for me )

Meeting Richard Gledhill tomorrow as he's just done the biz to his & if he's going to totally embarass me then I won't even try



[This message has been edited by Puff The Magic Wagon! (edited 21 April 2001).]
Old 21 April 2001 | 10:19 AM
  #2  
RB5SCOTT's Avatar
RB5SCOTT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 0
Talking

i do believe that Autocar once tested the Prodrive RB5 at 4.9

Scott
Old 21 April 2001 | 10:45 AM
  #3  
Neil Smalley's Avatar
Neil Smalley
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 8,204
Likes: 0
Talking

Evo mag says
5 seconds to 60(down from 5.4)
14.1 to 100(down from 14.6)

Oddly autocar says 5.6 for the prodrive and 5.3 for the standard car. But the 0-100 is down to 13.9 from 14.9

A 5 second 60 time and 14.1 0-100 time feels about right from when I had my car PPP'd.

I've heard that a PPP'd car can match or exceed a standard STI in the real world(I.e not round a race track), although i'm not inclined to test the theory.

It very much depends on how you launch the car, as to what figures you get. The car is sooo much smoother to drive, faster and much more progressive


Old 21 April 2001 | 10:53 AM
  #4  
Stef's Avatar
Stef
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
Post

Well, a non-PPP'd UK car with other breathing mods is capable of 0-60 in 4.5secs and 0-100 in 13.2secs apparently.
With a PPP it should be quicker still, no?

Stef.
Old 21 April 2001 | 11:28 AM
  #5  
Clarkey's Avatar
Clarkey
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Post

I agree - my non-PPP MY99 was recently (accurately) tested at 4.81 to 60 and 13.3 to 100, without being too violent.
Old 21 April 2001 | 11:54 AM
  #6  
subevo's Avatar
subevo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Post

clocked 14.6 secs without really trying(granny start) at crail quarter mile strip.uk my 99 wagon with 3 people inside.
Old 21 April 2001 | 10:03 PM
  #7  
Scotsman's Avatar
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Stirling
Post

Clarkey - what mods have you done to your MY99 to get that performance?

(only had mine for 4 weeks and starting to get the bug!)
Old 21 April 2001 | 10:14 PM
  #8  
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 16,978
Likes: 15
From: From far, far away...
Talking

Nice replies peeps

Should say that PPP against Standard is the benchmark @D

Keep 'em coming
Old 22 April 2001 | 12:23 AM
  #9  
Clarkey's Avatar
Clarkey
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Post

Scotsman,

I have a Scoobysport backbox, Magnex centre section and Scoobysport downpipe. 260bhp at Powerengineering and 248lb/ft torque, it was about 230bhp before any mods. I did have an induction kit but I took it off as it was too loud. I would guess from looking at dyno plots that these figures have a similar effect to the PPP, possibly with a little less torque.

I mate of mine (Dazzler) on this list recorded 5.2 seconds to 60 in a My00 with scoobysport backbox. We tested it using a AP-22 (see
Old 22 April 2001 | 01:07 AM
  #10  
CossieClint's Avatar
CossieClint
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Post

Sorry for the ignorance but what does PPP stand for ?

Regards
Clint
Old 22 April 2001 | 07:51 AM
  #11  
GaryC's Avatar
GaryC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
Post

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by CossieClint:
<B>Sorry for the ignorance but what does PPP stand for ?

Regards
Clint[/quote]

Prodrive Performance Pack.


A client I used to deal with (was part of ICI) made/makes various forms of IR equipment, and twice fitted infa-red timing equipment to my car, once as standard PPP, and once after induction kit, downpipe and straight through centre section had been fitted.

I was driving, so launches were far from the best but I got just under 4.8 with PPP, and a fraction over 4.5 after the other kit had been fitted. Only did one launch each time, as clutch/diff smelt 'well done'

IIRC, Best ever time recorded for a totally standard scoob was 5.05 (Performance car magazine), so allowing for my crap launch ability, I would say you are looking at around half second from std to PPP?

But the PPPs strength is mid range grunt/delivery, so 0-60 probably doesn't tell the whole story
Old 22 April 2001 | 09:16 AM
  #12  
Fosters's Avatar
Fosters
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Islington
Post

sounds good
If I had some brakes, I might be able to keep up with an STi then!
Old 22 April 2001 | 12:42 PM
  #13  
DocJock's Avatar
DocJock
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: a more anarchic place
Wink

Puff

You know I'm not convinced outright speed is much changed, just how it's delivered....

DJ
Old 22 April 2001 | 08:38 PM
  #14  
kryten's Avatar
kryten
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Post

Having driven non-PPP and PPP cars back to back, the most noticeable difference with the PPP is the amount of 'oommphh' available from 2-2.5k revs whereas the standard really needed 3-3.5k revs to get going.

I found this really noticeable when I took a Skyline (330bhp) out for a test drive. OK so it had and extra 70bhp BUT it had NOTHING below 4k revs - it needed 2nd for a 50mph overtake. So its not just about the power you have, but how/where its delivered...

As a matter of interest, given a Dyno plot of power/torque does anyone know how to calculate the best upshift point? I'd love to know whether its worth holding a gear right to just before the limiter, or where the best point short of that to change up is!
Old 22 April 2001 | 08:39 PM
  #15  
Scotsman's Avatar
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Stirling
Post

Thx for the info Clarkey

Does the exhaust or backbox make the sound different? Not keen on it being any noiser (or to get more performance is that a side effect?)



[This message has been edited by Scotsman (edited 22 April 2001).]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darrell@Scoobyworx
Trader Announcements
26
30 January 2024 01:27 PM
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
01 December 2015 09:37 AM
Shaun
Other Marques
33
26 October 2015 10:57 AM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 02:17 PM
legb4rsk
Non Scooby Related
14
01 October 2015 05:18 AM



Quick Reply: PPP 0-60 Times



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.