0 - 60 times?
#1
0 - 60 times?
I've done a little research and can't really find what i'm looking for.
IMO the impreza is an A2B car and specialises in getting off the mark quickly in most conditions.
I know the majority of people are chasing BHP and Torque but how many people are chasing 0-60 times.
I know there are lots of 1/4 mile times posted and also top speed but what about 0 - 60????
So, please feel free to jump in and state you claim...
1. Vehicle sti 98 V5 etc......
2. Modifications 6 speed, exeedy twin plate clutch, AL, LC, 2.1 stroker, SC42 etc....
3. How it has been timed stopwatch, onboard electronic device
4. Plans or opinions on how to make it go quicker???
IMO the impreza is an A2B car and specialises in getting off the mark quickly in most conditions.
I know the majority of people are chasing BHP and Torque but how many people are chasing 0-60 times.
I know there are lots of 1/4 mile times posted and also top speed but what about 0 - 60????
So, please feel free to jump in and state you claim...
1. Vehicle sti 98 V5 etc......
2. Modifications 6 speed, exeedy twin plate clutch, AL, LC, 2.1 stroker, SC42 etc....
3. How it has been timed stopwatch, onboard electronic device
4. Plans or opinions on how to make it go quicker???
Trending Topics
#8
Just a little research and i found this: -
Ferrari F430 0 to 60 mph and Quarter Mile Times
2005 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9
2005 Ferrari F430 Spider 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3
2006 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3
2006 Ferrari F430 Spider F1 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9
2008 Ferrari F430 Scuderia 0-60 mph 3.5 Quarter mile 11.5
2009 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.1 Quarter Mile 12.5
2009 Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M 0-60 mph 3.6
Is this what we're really comparing against to 60? I understand that with our little 2.0 2.1 2.2 and 2.5 engines we can't compete with the big V8's once they're up to 70/80 mph but it's quite impressive so far
Ferrari F430 0 to 60 mph and Quarter Mile Times
2005 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9
2005 Ferrari F430 Spider 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3
2006 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3
2006 Ferrari F430 Spider F1 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9
2008 Ferrari F430 Scuderia 0-60 mph 3.5 Quarter mile 11.5
2009 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.1 Quarter Mile 12.5
2009 Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M 0-60 mph 3.6
Is this what we're really comparing against to 60? I understand that with our little 2.0 2.1 2.2 and 2.5 engines we can't compete with the big V8's once they're up to 70/80 mph but it's quite impressive so far
#10
Just a little research and i found this: -
Ferrari F430 0 to 60 mph and Quarter Mile Times
2005 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9
2005 Ferrari F430 Spider 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3
2006 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3
2006 Ferrari F430 Spider F1 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9
2008 Ferrari F430 Scuderia 0-60 mph 3.5 Quarter mile 11.5
2009 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.1 Quarter Mile 12.5
2009 Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M 0-60 mph 3.6
Is this what we're really comparing against to 60? I understand that with our little 2.0 2.1 2.2 and 2.5 engines we can't compete with the big V8's once they're up to 70/80 mph but it's quite impressive so far
Ferrari F430 0 to 60 mph and Quarter Mile Times
2005 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9
2005 Ferrari F430 Spider 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3
2006 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3
2006 Ferrari F430 Spider F1 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9
2008 Ferrari F430 Scuderia 0-60 mph 3.5 Quarter mile 11.5
2009 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.1 Quarter Mile 12.5
2009 Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M 0-60 mph 3.6
Is this what we're really comparing against to 60? I understand that with our little 2.0 2.1 2.2 and 2.5 engines we can't compete with the big V8's once they're up to 70/80 mph but it's quite impressive so far
And none of those times would of been set in the 'real world'.
Published 0-60 times from manufacturers are far from what you'll achoeve on the road/track.
Look at the time for a newage wrx ppp, something like 4.5 secs. Impossible to achieve by anybody in the real world.
#11
I have know idea what mine will do it in. Subaru/Prodrive officially stated 0-62 in 4.8 secs although a lot of jurnos and press test drivers managed 4.5 secs, probably due to faster gear changes. Standard power torque was 316/330. Im running about 380/433 now and have flat foot gear shift so should be at least 0.5 secs quicker i would have thought?
#12
I have know idea what mine will do it in. Subaru/Prodrive officially stated 0-62 in 4.8 secs although a lot of jurnos and press test drivers managed 4.5 secs, probably due to faster gear changes. Standard power torque was 316/330. Im running about 380/433 now and have flat foot gear shift so should be at least 0.5 secs quicker i would have thought?
Power to Weight: 258 bhp/ton
0-60: 4.4
0-100: 10.5
60-100: 6.1
1/4 Mile ET: 12.65
1/4 Mile Terminal: 111
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 12.30
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 114
#13
According to http://www.torquestats.com/:-
Power to Weight: 258 bhp/ton
0-60: 4.4
0-100: 10.5
60-100: 6.1
1/4 Mile ET: 12.65
1/4 Mile Terminal: 111
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 12.30
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 114
Power to Weight: 258 bhp/ton
0-60: 4.4
0-100: 10.5
60-100: 6.1
1/4 Mile ET: 12.65
1/4 Mile Terminal: 111
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 12.30
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 114
#14
According to http://www.torquestats.com/:-
Power to Weight: 258 bhp/ton
0-60: 4.4
0-100: 10.5
60-100: 6.1
1/4 Mile ET: 12.65
1/4 Mile Terminal: 111
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 12.30
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 114
Power to Weight: 258 bhp/ton
0-60: 4.4
0-100: 10.5
60-100: 6.1
1/4 Mile ET: 12.65
1/4 Mile Terminal: 111
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 12.30
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 114
12.3 quarter with 258bhp per ton
Not a chance.
#16
ive no clue on the 0-60 time on my car, but i do have the slips which tell me 0-60ft of 1.8, quarter mile of 13.1.... any good? as i have no idea?
Last edited by lord shaun 83; 17 March 2013 at 07:19 PM. Reason: put 12 insted of 13 oops
#17
The problem with 0-60 times is twofold.
First off, you get idiots like TopGear who now quote 0-62 because that's 0-100kph and the rest of Europe do it.
But the main problem is accuracy.
First off, how are you measuring the speed? Unless it's with a calibrated speedo, or electronically, forget it.
Secondly, how are you timing it? Stopwatch? Let's say that average human reaction time is 0.18 seconds.
So......suppose you are 0.18 seconds late starting, and 0.18 seconds early stopping the clock, that's 0.36 seconds.
And when you get down to the 4 seconds mark, that's a 9% error..not acceptable.
So 0-60 times are a bit inaccurate.
First off, you get idiots like TopGear who now quote 0-62 because that's 0-100kph and the rest of Europe do it.
But the main problem is accuracy.
First off, how are you measuring the speed? Unless it's with a calibrated speedo, or electronically, forget it.
Secondly, how are you timing it? Stopwatch? Let's say that average human reaction time is 0.18 seconds.
So......suppose you are 0.18 seconds late starting, and 0.18 seconds early stopping the clock, that's 0.36 seconds.
And when you get down to the 4 seconds mark, that's a 9% error..not acceptable.
So 0-60 times are a bit inaccurate.
#23
#24
#25
I did take into consideration peoples guesstamates, hence the question of how are you timing it.
The main reason why i'm asking for 0 -60 is because of what i've stated in the original thread about being A2B and what you can actually do on the road legally.
I'm chuffed with the replies so far though
The main reason why i'm asking for 0 -60 is because of what i've stated in the original thread about being A2B and what you can actually do on the road legally.
I'm chuffed with the replies so far though
#26
Yeah but 60-100 is mid-range times not acceleration time. Sure from 0 to what ever you could miss a gear or ***** up the launch which is whay you do several runs rather than take the data from a single test run.
#27
sounds a lot of work to get the figures when i can just boot it each to their own though
#29
#30
you are correct thats why i use a racelogic performance box no need to do the maths!