Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

0 - 60 times?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 March 2013 | 03:09 PM
  #1  
Markfey's Avatar
Markfey
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,008
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default 0 - 60 times?

I've done a little research and can't really find what i'm looking for.

IMO the impreza is an A2B car and specialises in getting off the mark quickly in most conditions.

I know the majority of people are chasing BHP and Torque but how many people are chasing 0-60 times.

I know there are lots of 1/4 mile times posted and also top speed but what about 0 - 60????

So, please feel free to jump in and state you claim...

1. Vehicle sti 98 V5 etc......
2. Modifications 6 speed, exeedy twin plate clutch, AL, LC, 2.1 stroker, SC42 etc....
3. How it has been timed stopwatch, onboard electronic device
4. Plans or opinions on how to make it go quicker???
Old 17 March 2013 | 03:18 PM
  #2  
*BADGER*'s Avatar
*BADGER*
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: East yorkshire
Default

my lasses classic turbo did it in 6.1 thats running on 18"wheels
Old 17 March 2013 | 03:19 PM
  #3  
BILLETBEANZ's Avatar
BILLETBEANZ
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: west midlands
Default

500+bhp V4 type R 0-60 3.1sec 0-60feet 1.3sec
Old 17 March 2013 | 03:31 PM
  #4  
Markfey's Avatar
Markfey
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,008
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by BILLETBEANZ
500+bhp V4 type R 0-60 3.1sec 0-60feet 1.3sec
That's what i'm after!!!

What's the spec, engine, gearbox, clutch etc??
Old 17 March 2013 | 03:36 PM
  #5  
psycho sport's Avatar
psycho sport
Scooby Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

335bhp Newage wrx Wagon, 0-60 4.7 seconds. Standard clutch and 5 speed.
Old 17 March 2013 | 03:47 PM
  #6  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by BILLETBEANZ
500+bhp V4 type R 0-60 3.1sec 0-60feet 1.3sec
What tyres
Old 17 March 2013 | 03:58 PM
  #7  
rooferman's Avatar
rooferman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 0
Default

Few years back now but with 380 bhp I did a 3.59 to 60mph on proper timed gear at trax Silverstone.


That inc 3 gear changes on ra box.


I think it would be a bit quicker now though
Old 17 March 2013 | 05:49 PM
  #8  
Markfey's Avatar
Markfey
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,008
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Just a little research and i found this: -

Ferrari F430 0 to 60 mph and Quarter Mile Times

2005 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9

2005 Ferrari F430 Spider 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3

2006 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3

2006 Ferrari F430 Spider F1 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9

2008 Ferrari F430 Scuderia 0-60 mph 3.5 Quarter mile 11.5

2009 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.1 Quarter Mile 12.5

2009 Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M 0-60 mph 3.6

Is this what we're really comparing against to 60? I understand that with our little 2.0 2.1 2.2 and 2.5 engines we can't compete with the big V8's once they're up to 70/80 mph but it's quite impressive so far
Old 17 March 2013 | 06:10 PM
  #9  
logger's Avatar
logger
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: kendal/tidworth
Default

240bhp new age wrx timed on a trusty Iphone.
5.5 seconds 0-60 pretty much hated doing it to my car as it felt like it was break something lol
Old 17 March 2013 | 06:19 PM
  #10  
MattyB1983's Avatar
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 46
From: Around
Default

Originally Posted by Markfey
Just a little research and i found this: -

Ferrari F430 0 to 60 mph and Quarter Mile Times

2005 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9

2005 Ferrari F430 Spider 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3

2006 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter mile 12.3

2006 Ferrari F430 Spider F1 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter mile 11.9

2008 Ferrari F430 Scuderia 0-60 mph 3.5 Quarter mile 11.5

2009 Ferrari F430 0-60 mph 4.1 Quarter Mile 12.5

2009 Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M 0-60 mph 3.6

Is this what we're really comparing against to 60? I understand that with our little 2.0 2.1 2.2 and 2.5 engines we can't compete with the big V8's once they're up to 70/80 mph but it's quite impressive so far

And none of those times would of been set in the 'real world'.
Published 0-60 times from manufacturers are far from what you'll achoeve on the road/track.
Look at the time for a newage wrx ppp, something like 4.5 secs. Impossible to achieve by anybody in the real world.
Old 17 March 2013 | 06:26 PM
  #11  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

I have know idea what mine will do it in. Subaru/Prodrive officially stated 0-62 in 4.8 secs although a lot of jurnos and press test drivers managed 4.5 secs, probably due to faster gear changes. Standard power torque was 316/330. Im running about 380/433 now and have flat foot gear shift so should be at least 0.5 secs quicker i would have thought?
Old 17 March 2013 | 06:53 PM
  #12  
Norman Dog's Avatar
Norman Dog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 24
From: South Shields Tyne & Wear
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
I have know idea what mine will do it in. Subaru/Prodrive officially stated 0-62 in 4.8 secs although a lot of jurnos and press test drivers managed 4.5 secs, probably due to faster gear changes. Standard power torque was 316/330. Im running about 380/433 now and have flat foot gear shift so should be at least 0.5 secs quicker i would have thought?
According to http://www.torquestats.com/:-

Power to Weight: 258 bhp/ton
0-60: 4.4
0-100: 10.5
60-100: 6.1
1/4 Mile ET: 12.65
1/4 Mile Terminal: 111
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 12.30
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 114
Old 17 March 2013 | 06:59 PM
  #13  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Norman Dog
According to http://www.torquestats.com/:-

Power to Weight: 258 bhp/ton
0-60: 4.4
0-100: 10.5
60-100: 6.1
1/4 Mile ET: 12.65
1/4 Mile Terminal: 111
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 12.30
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 114
Sound fair enough Probably a fair bit slower than that with me behind the wheel
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #14  
MattyB1983's Avatar
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 46
From: Around
Default

Originally Posted by Norman Dog
According to http://www.torquestats.com/:-

Power to Weight: 258 bhp/ton
0-60: 4.4
0-100: 10.5
60-100: 6.1
1/4 Mile ET: 12.65
1/4 Mile Terminal: 111
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 12.30
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 114

12.3 quarter with 258bhp per ton

Not a chance.
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:07 PM
  #15  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MattyB1983
12.3 quarter with 258bhp per ton

Not a chance.
Come on then. State your case? sounds about right to me from other cars with similar spec at the pod ive seen.
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:18 PM
  #16  
lord shaun 83's Avatar
lord shaun 83
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: staffordshire
Default

ive no clue on the 0-60 time on my car, but i do have the slips which tell me 0-60ft of 1.8, quarter mile of 13.1.... any good? as i have no idea?

Last edited by lord shaun 83; 17 March 2013 at 07:19 PM. Reason: put 12 insted of 13 oops
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:20 PM
  #17  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,781
Likes: 27
From: Rl'yeh
Default

The problem with 0-60 times is twofold.
First off, you get idiots like TopGear who now quote 0-62 because that's 0-100kph and the rest of Europe do it.

But the main problem is accuracy.

First off, how are you measuring the speed? Unless it's with a calibrated speedo, or electronically, forget it.

Secondly, how are you timing it? Stopwatch? Let's say that average human reaction time is 0.18 seconds.

So......suppose you are 0.18 seconds late starting, and 0.18 seconds early stopping the clock, that's 0.36 seconds.

And when you get down to the 4 seconds mark, that's a 9% error..not acceptable.

So 0-60 times are a bit inaccurate.
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:22 PM
  #18  
stealthy55's Avatar
stealthy55
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Default

sooner see 60-100 times myself, a lot easier on the car and more "everyday"
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:23 PM
  #19  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,781
Likes: 27
From: Rl'yeh
Default

And even more open to inaccuracies.
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:28 PM
  #20  
stealthy55's Avatar
stealthy55
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
And even more open to inaccuracies.
if thats refering to me, give us a clue then?
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:28 PM
  #21  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stealthy55
sooner see 60-100 times myself, a lot easier on the car and more "everyday"
I think 0-100 mph is a better indication of a cars acceleration performance than 0-60.
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:31 PM
  #22  
stealthy55's Avatar
stealthy55
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
I think 0-100 mph is a better indication of a cars acceleration performance than 0-60.
but driver error can be involved, as in 0-60
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:33 PM
  #23  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stealthy55
but driver error can be involved, as in 0-60
well to get a real world time you would do several runs and take the average. For boasting you would do several runs and pick the fastest.
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:42 PM
  #24  
stealthy55's Avatar
stealthy55
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
well to get a real world time you would do several runs and take the average. For boasting you would do several runs and pick the fastest.
what i meant was you can miss gears, bog down on these 0-whatever, 60-100 is rolling so takes out the launching equation
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:48 PM
  #25  
Markfey's Avatar
Markfey
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,008
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

I did take into consideration peoples guesstamates, hence the question of how are you timing it.

The main reason why i'm asking for 0 -60 is because of what i've stated in the original thread about being A2B and what you can actually do on the road legally.

I'm chuffed with the replies so far though
Old 17 March 2013 | 07:51 PM
  #26  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stealthy55
what i meant was you can miss gears, bog down on these 0-whatever, 60-100 is rolling so takes out the launching equation
Yeah but 60-100 is mid-range times not acceleration time. Sure from 0 to what ever you could miss a gear or ***** up the launch which is whay you do several runs rather than take the data from a single test run.
Old 17 March 2013 | 08:02 PM
  #27  
stealthy55's Avatar
stealthy55
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
Yeah but 60-100 is mid-range times not acceleration time. Sure from 0 to what ever you could miss a gear or ***** up the launch which is whay you do several runs rather than take the data from a single test run.
sounds a lot of work to get the figures when i can just boot it each to their own though
Old 17 March 2013 | 08:31 PM
  #28  
stubarura's Avatar
stubarura
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: co durham
Default

1st attempt
0-30: 2.00 seconds
0-60: 5.06 seconds

max accel gfofce: 1.21

using g-tac on the old iphone
Old 17 March 2013 | 08:35 PM
  #29  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,781
Likes: 27
From: Rl'yeh
Default

Originally Posted by stealthy55
if thats refering to me, give us a clue then?
The speedo is inaccurate enough at 60mph, trying to start a stopwatch as it PASSES 60mph, then stop it accurately as it PASSES 100 mph, where it's likely wildly inaccurate anyway....well, you do the maths.
Old 17 March 2013 | 08:39 PM
  #30  
stealthy55's Avatar
stealthy55
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
The speedo is inaccurate enough at 60mph, trying to start a stopwatch as it PASSES 60mph, then stop it accurately as it PASSES 100 mph, where it's likely wildly inaccurate anyway....well, you do the maths.
you are correct thats why i use a racelogic performance box no need to do the maths!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.