Thread: Question Time
View Single Post
Old 23 January 2011, 09:40 AM
  #13  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Fewer would of been 'kiiled', but far more would of died.

Infant mortality rate was just awful in Iraq under Sadam, it's now much much lower, on that score alone we have saved 100's thousands of lives over the past 8 years.

Of course sanctions had much to do with the high mortality rate, but those would never of been lifted whilst Sadam was in power, for me it just adds power to the argument that we did the right thing in getting rid of him.
beautifully constructed circular argument btw

high mortality rate

caused by our sanctions

which would remain – causing more and more deaths

so we had to get rid of Saddam

back to top