Originally Posted by SouthEastMods.co.uk
(Post 6716510)
if you turned up in an M3 i'm sure they'd ask to see your passport or if you had any bud, as M3's are mainly driven by immigrants/drug dealers or both. The majority of the general public would say the BM has less status, as Bm's are usually driven by idiots without a concern for anyone else on the road, they are 2 a penny, sound awful, are overweight and bought purely because they are a BMW.
Southeastmods.co.uk :iamwithst .........nothing more to say :cuckoo: :lol1: |
Well I'd agree with the "bought purely because they're a BMW" statement if nothing else.
The number of pocket money special BMW's you see around with big alloys and the badge delete option ticked because they could only afford the 1.6 amazes me considering they could have actually bought a decent car for the same money. But then it wouldn't have been a BMW right? Can't afford to do it properly? Don't do it. Not saying BMW's arn't decent cars - but someone buying a new 316 needs their head looked at. |
Originally Posted by The Chief
(Post 6716132)
Crikey Glen do you not go to bed fella????:)
|
Originally Posted by Prasius
(Post 6716633)
Well I'd agree with the "bought purely because they're a BMW" statement if nothing else.
The number of pocket money special BMW's you see around with big alloys and the badge delete option ticked because they could only afford the 1.6 amazes me considering they could have actually bought a decent car for the same money. But then it wouldn't have been a BMW right? Can't afford to do it properly? Don't do it. Not saying BMW's arn't decent cars - but someone buying a new 316 needs their head looked at. Agreed, but he was talking about M3's, not 316's |
Ah sorry - I thought this thread had just descended into "BMW's are crap" ;)
|
Originally Posted by SouthEastMods.co.uk
(Post 6716510)
They might laugh, but get them in the passenger seat and i'm sure they'd change their minds about Subaru's. Whereas if you turned up in an M3 i'm sure they'd ask to see your passport or if you had any bud, as M3's are mainly driven by immigrants/drug dealers or both. The majority of the general public would say the BM has less status, as Bm's are usually driven by idiots without a concern for anyone else on the road, they are 2 a penny, sound awful, are overweight and bought purely because they are a BMW.
Southeastmods.co.uk |
Originally Posted by flat4_ire
(Post 6716851)
ur a dope
And you're not exactly the sharpest knife in the rack! |
Originally Posted by banny sti
(Post 6716901)
And you're not exactly the sharpest knife in the rack!
|
You are typical ex impreza owner! Now that you do not have one anymore, you have nothing good to say about them and every other car is the best thing since sliced bread.
I have driven everything from a 1 ltr micra to a SL55 AMG, so I am in a pretty good position to comment on the M3. On whole they are good car, that does everything well but does not excel in any one area! Banny |
ive nothin good to say about imprezas!!? im far from a "typical ex scoob owner" i just earlier that i still love them! Always will, also love evo's and GTR's and Supras too but theyre al very different cars in their own right, il probably own another scooby some day :D
|
Hi,
Hello people, we all seem to be getting a bit steamed up! I currently have an M3 Cab with SMG and my last car was a Turbo2000 MY99 with an aftermarket exhaust and Unichip Remap. So I have driven both cars in question, and the M3 is faster in all respects apart from 0-30. The scooby always got away quicker due to 4wd, it never spun unless you were trying to tear the clutch out of it (once-and it smelled so bad I never repeated). The M3 is faster doing anything above 30mph, straight/twisty motorway, whatever. A lot faster. And to show how unbiased I am, when I sell my M3 it will probably be replaced by a Jap Import STI from Litchfields or similar, as the scooby had so much more character. The M3 is a better car, speed, handling, build, but its too bland compared to scoob. Ok you can all take no notice, but at least I have actually owned both unlike most test pilots on here:notworthy |
You need to drive a JDM Impreza then compared it to the M3, you will be pleasently suprised!
Banny |
I have had a go in a 2.5l STI demonstrator from stan palmers (cumbria) but it was difficult to really find out what it would do in such a short time.
It didnt excite me enough to part with hard earned, but the M3 did.:wonder: |
Originally Posted by banny sti
(Post 6716981)
You need to drive a JDM Impreza then compared it to the M3, you will be pleasently suprised!
Banny |
I was referring to the newage JDM
|
I wouldn't call an impreza a sports car. I'd put Z5's, MX-5's and such into the "sports-car" mould i'd say Impreza's, Evo's, M3's etc are more performance cars.
There's a lot of badge attached to the M3 as with all BM's thats why they are everywhere, and i'd expect most owners were set on buying one before driving one. This is a bit of a non-arguement really, the price of the M3 in comparison to a scoob should mean it should be compared to cars in the same bracket, not something half the price. |
Originally Posted by ClassicBlueMica
(Post 6716970)
Hello people, we all seem to be getting a bit steamed up!
So I have driven both cars in question, and the M3 is faster in all respects apart from 0-30. |
On the "twistys" ie B roads, you are typically travelling 40 to XXX.(Lets imagine the road was closed for a special stage etc if the busys are reading this)On the tarmac over 40mph, neither car is losing forward speed due to lack of grip. You can feel the wheels fighting for grip on a scoob in 2/3 and in the M3 the DSC will light up for the odd second here and there if its wet.But the bottom line is you need chassis and power which the M3 shades the scooby. 4wd will only really count on the gravel in the forests!!!BTW, remember the old BTCC touring cars that had the 4wd A4, it tore off the line but after that, no advantage.M3 = more grunt = faster.
|
The guy who made the comment about not wanting to turn up in a Scoob pretty much has it right when it comes down to image. A friend of mine does "tax minimisation" for some very wealthy clients and we had this very same discussion on the weekend.
I said to him, a 911 Porker owner (who has just ordered an Enzo for a client and has a slot for a Veyron for 1.4 million Euro) that if he wanted a seriously fast car then he should be out buying an EVO FQ 360-400. Usual argument followed and what it boiled down to is that sure an EVO or an STI might be faster A to B on some twisty country roads but who the feck wants to be seen pulling up in a a glorified Jap lunch box. So we might be able to beat a lot of very expensive machinery but basically they dont give a toss as they have the cash to "be seen" :D |
Originally Posted by ClassicBlueMica
(Post 6718151)
On the "twistys" ie B roads, you are typically travelling 40 to XXX.(Lets imagine the road was closed for a special stage etc if the busys are reading this)On the tarmac over 40mph, neither car is losing forward speed due to lack of grip. You can feel the wheels fighting for grip on a scoob in 2/3 and in the M3 the DSC will light up for the odd second here and there if its wet.But the bottom line is you need chassis and power which the M3 shades the scooby. 4wd will only really count on the gravel in the forests!!!BTW, remember the old BTCC touring cars that had the 4wd A4, it tore off the line but after that, no advantage.M3 = more grunt = faster.
Point to point the Subaru STI PPP is quicker :) And don't tell me that was fixed!!! :brickwall |
Originally Posted by jubhi
(Post 6718179)
Why is the STI PPP(130.1) almost 2 secs quicker than the M3(131.8) on a dry tarmac track driven by the Stig on Top Gear??? I'd say that was a pretty fair test :razz:
Point to point the Subaru STI PPP is quicker :) And don't tell me that was fixed!!! :brickwall |
Originally Posted by leonpoole
(Post 6718237)
He obviously wasn't trying in the M3 :lol1:
|
(sucked in)
|
Originally Posted by ClassicBlueMica
(Post 6718151)
4wd will only really count on the gravel in the forests!!! |
Originally Posted by swaussie
(Post 6718167)
I said to him, a 911 Porker owner (who has just ordered an Enzo for a client and has a slot for a Veyron for 1.4 million Euro) that if he wanted a seriously fast car then he should be out buying an EVO FQ 360-400. Usual argument followed and what it boiled down to is that sure an EVO or an STI might be faster A to B on some twisty country roads but who the feck wants to be seen pulling up in a a glorified Jap lunch box.
So we might be able to beat a lot of very expensive machinery but basically they dont give a toss as they have the cash to "be seen" :D Probably a little harsh, but if we are talking about "image" here. Of course if they pulled up in a 911 RS my opinion would be "they're nails to live with that as a daily driver!" and assume they were a driving god :D. |
FWIW i've been spanked on numerous occasions off rounabouts in dry and wet by m3's in my standard 2003 wrx.
|
Originally Posted by ClassicBlueMica
(Post 6718151)
You can feel the wheels fighting for grip on a scoob in 2/3 and in the M3 the DSC will light up for the odd second here and there if its wet.But the bottom line is you need chassis and power which the M3 shades the scooby. 4wd will only really count on the gravel in the forests!!!BTW, remember the old BTCC touring cars that had the 4wd A4, it tore off the line but after that, no advantage.M3 = more grunt = faster.
(sucked in) If a rear wheel drive BTCC car is faster than a 4 wheel drive, that indicates they are faster round a track. It doesn't give any indication of their performance on a B road. One of the advantages of the BM on a track, is getting the back out and keeping the power on, which isn't such an advantage on B roads, where you're less able to go sideways. Scoobs suffer from understeer on fast track corners, which happens a lot less on slower B roads, removing another advantage of the BM. |
Originally Posted by ClassicBlueMica
(Post 6718151)
On the "twistys" ie B roads, you are typically travelling 40 to XXX.(Lets imagine the road was closed for a special stage etc if the busys are reading this)On the tarmac over 40mph, neither car is losing forward speed due to lack of grip. You can feel the wheels fighting for grip on a scoob in 2/3 and in the M3 the DSC will light up for the odd second here and there if its wet.But the bottom line is you need chassis and power which the M3 shades the scooby. 4wd will only really count on the gravel in the forests!!!BTW, remember the old BTCC touring cars that had the 4wd A4, it tore off the line but after that, no advantage.M3 = more grunt = faster.
PS the Audi BTCC carried an very heavy weight penalty for 4WD as it outperformed the two wheel drive cars. I think the new regs are the same - 4WD has the heaviest weight penalties. |
Originally Posted by Rannoch
(Post 6718492)
And as observed earlier when Don Palmer was significantly quicker around the circuit in my Spec C than the M3 Cabriolet...may he was not trying in the M3 that day...
PS the Audi BTCC carried an very heavy weight penalty for 4WD as it outperformed the two wheel drive cars. I think the new regs are the same - 4WD has the heaviest weight penalties. |
Originally Posted by Triggaaar
(Post 6717787)
There's nothing like a 'which is faster' thread to get us all arguing.
I'm surprised you think it's faster on B roads, or in the wet. The scoob is easier to drive quickly on twisty roads, and while some of the people here are very good (fast) drivers, it's harder to safely get to the limit with an M3 on B roads. A well driven M3 would beat a Scoob on a dry track, where the Scoobs understeer is more of a problem, and the M3s power can be used. The M3 is still quick - as when the DSC is switched off it is only partialy so (I believe this is a pro-active traction control system). So the backend can get twitchy but if it gets too twitchy the DSC actually cuts in. So can make for some pretty rapid progress through the bends. If you hold the button for 15 Secs and fully turn off the DSC on the M3 then the Scoob will definately be the quicker car on the cross country stuff. The thing I like about scoobs on cross contry road say with damp and dry patches is that you know exactuly where you are with them when the tyres are losing grip - with the M3 (fantastic car that it is) it doesnt give me confidence of exactly how progressive the loss of grip will be on this type of road. However I still think that these big RWD BHP cars come into their own at the top end on the Autobahn where the BHP really counts and on the track. Where you could exploit the M3s precision and RWD oversteer characteristics to maximum advantage (sure there are specific scoobs such as the SpecC that may well out run an M3 on the track - But the M3 is the more “Pure“ drive) Barvaria builds the M3. Look at Barvarian Roads - long autobahns with no speed limits, many of the “A roads“ have long sweeping cruves. Its no coincidence that the M3 is a product that excells on these roads. Not a typical damp AorB road in Wales. My two pennys worth. I will now let the argument rage :D :D Steve :) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands